Monday, March 31, 2014
Why Judgment
Why Judgment?
Have you considered some of what we teach is not logical? Our sins have been forgiven, blotted out. There is no condemnation for us. What will we be giving an account of or for?
Acts 2: Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins
Acts 3: Repent therefore, and turn back, that your sins may be blotted out,
Romans 8: There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus
Hebrews 9: And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment,
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Women
Throughout most of history women generally have had fewer legal rights and career opportunities than men women being considered intellectually inferior to men.
Early Christian theology perpetuated these views. St. Jerome, a 4th-century Latin father of the Christian church, said: "Woman is the gate of the devil, the path of wickedness, the sting of the serpent, in a word a perilous object." Thomas Aquinas, the 13th-century Christian theologian, said that woman was "created to be man's helpmeet, but her unique role is in conception . . . since for other purposes men would be better assisted by other men."
Traditionally a middle-class girl in Western culture tended to learn from her mother's example that cooking, cleaning, and caring for children was the behavior expected of her when she grew up. Tests made in the 1960s showed that the scholastic achievement of girls was higher in the early grades than in high school. The major reason being the girls' own expectations declined because neither their families nor their teachers expected them to prepare for a future other than that of marriage and motherhood.
Formal education for girls historically has been secondary to that for boys. In colonial America girls learned to read and write at dame schools. They could attend the master's schools for boys when there was room, usually during the summer when most of the boys were working.
The myth of the natural inferiority of women greatly influenced the status of women in law. Under the common law of England, an unmarried woman could own property, make a contract, or sue and be sued. But a married woman, defined as being one with her husband, gave up her name, and virtually all her property came under her husband's control.
During the early history of the United States, a man virtually owned his wife and children as he did his material possessions. Some communities modified the common law to allow women to own property in their own names if their husbands agreed.
Many retail stores would not issue independent credit cards to married women. Divorced or single women often found it difficult to obtain credit. Laws concerned with welfare, crime, prostitution, and abortion also displayed a bias against women. A mother receiving government welfare payments was subject to frequent investigations in order to verify her welfare claim. A woman who shot and killed her husband would be accused of homicide, but the shooting of a wife by her husband could be termed a "passion shooting." Often women prostitutes were prosecuted although their male customers were allowed to go free
Women constituted almost half of employed persons in the United States in 1989, but they had only a small share of the decision-making jobs. Despite the Equal Pay Act of 1963, women in 1970 were paid about 45 percent less than men for the same jobs; in 1988, about 32 percent less.
Working women faced discrimination because they were married or would most likely get married, they would not be permanent workers.
American women have had the right to vote since 1920, but their political roles have been minimal. It was not considered respectable for women to speak before mixed audiences of men and women.
Women and slaves were expected to be passive, cooperative, and obedient to their master-husbands. With the Union victory in the Civil War, women abolitionists hoped their hard work would result in suffrage for women as well as for blacks. But the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, adopted in 1868 and 1870 respectively, granted citizenship and suffrage to blacks but not to women.
The struggle to win the vote was slow. A woman-suffrage amendment to the Federal Constitution, presented to every Congress since 1878, repeatedly failed to pass.
Questioning an Axiom
When Albert Einstein was asked what led him to a new approach that was different from the physics of Isaac Newton he said, “I challenged an axiom.” I’ve heard preachers and teachers elaborate to their listeners on what Paul said was true about women. Some of which when looked at together appear contradictory or illogical.
We’ve been taught that Paul said women are more prone to fall when tempted than are men. After all, look at Eve. On the other hand, we are taught that women are responsible for upholding sexual virtues. Boys will be boys, but girls are ladies and must tell the boys to behave. If females are less resistant to temptation, why is it they who must tell males when enough is enough?
We are told that Paul said women are to obey their husbands and to be subject to male leadership. On the other hand we are taught that women have the ultimate position of leadership. You know, “the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.” If women are less fit to be leaders than men, how is it mothers can teach their sons to be good leaders?
This afternoon I heard President Carter on NPR pushing his new book. During the interview he mentioned he had left a section of the Baptist church when they took the position a female professor was not permitted to teach a college class if there was a male in the class.
A few years ago Dottie and I were in Abilene to attend the Singing School at ACU and attended the Highland Ave CofC, the congregation behind Herald of Truth and criticized at the time. The bulletin that week said the Elders had decided to undertake a five-year-study on women’s role in the church. A year or so ago I heard they had decided to permit women to do some things in the assembly.
Unless there is a conspiracy we have to give those elders the benefit of the doubt that they were operating with a good-faith-effort when they came to their conclusions. On the other hand congregations with long standing preachers do not question. Some authors I have read believe that Paul did not say what we are told he said. Considering the history of discrimination against women, I have to wonder, if those prejudices influence translators and teachers. Then I have to wonder about a God who will torture for eternity anyone who listens to a women preacher regardless of how staunch a follower of Jesus they may be.
Saturday, March 8, 2014
Facing Reality
Of all the challenges to faith, few are greater and have caused more believers to abandon their faith than the problem of evil. How can a loving, powerful God allow so much evil and suffering in the world?
We must first recognize that humans cause much---but not all---of it. Because humans exercise a genuine free will, they do terrible and immoral things. Free will is essential if the world is to have meaning. Christians see free will as a gift from God---a gift that brings meaning to life and is essential if humans are to relate meaningfully to God. For humans to truly love God, other humans, or themselves they must be free to choose or reject that love.
Because we are free, we can choose between real options. Because we are sinful, we can choose evil that in principle God could conceivably block. But for God to stop the evil in the world caused by humans, our freedom would have to be removed. God cannot give us free will while at the same time restraining us from evil acts.
Then there is natural evil. Volcanoes erupt and bury villages. Tsunamis inundate coastal cities and drown their inhabitants. Children fall off cliffs, Poisonous snakes bite babies. Lethal viruses and bacteria kill great numbers of innocent people every year. Plagues have ravaged human societies, ending the lives of millions of people in calamities of such magnitude they were often interpreted as divine judgments.
Both humans and all creation have freedom. Our freedom comes with a moral responsibility to use it properly. But that does not prevent us from doing terrible things. An often used example of evil is the Holocaust. The freedom God gave humans was exercised in the construction of gas chambers at Auschwitz and Dachau. But because humans have freedom, we do not say God created those gas chambers. God is, so to speak, off the hook for that evil. Unless God micromanages human decision making we will often abuse our freedom.
Not Dwell in Temples
Over the centuries much of what has been taught in Christian church buildings each week has roots in maintaining laity dependence upon the clergy i.e. saved-lost, heaven-hell, access to and understanding the scriptures, giving etc. GSMCOC is dependant upon one man as the sole source of religious information permitting church leaders to maintain control over what the laity believes.
One can peruse the GSMCOC budget and remain ignorant of the financial requirements of the congregation giving church leaders additional control. Are you familiar with the term “group think?”
What is the biblical reason to “give” and does it depend upon the amount given to be considered acceptable? When you look at the total contributed in all categories does it show that GSMCOC is generous or that we are lead by a fund raiser?
The Church of Christ prides itself on having bible examples for what it does. When Jesus was in the Wilderness his defense against Satan was “It is written…” Specifically which practices of the Church of Christ can be defended with “It is written..?”
Beautiful temples were commonplace among the Gentiles. Paul said God does not dwell in temples with hands.
Temples were rare among the Jews. We could say they were nonexistent except for the temple in Jerusalem, first built by Solomon.
Paul was saying that no temple ever built by man, including Solomon’s or the Parthenon, can contain God. To think the God who made the world and everything in it and who sustains the world by the power of His Word could be contained in a building regardless of size, beauty or cost diminishes his majesty.
God is Spirit, and spirit cannot be limited to any one space or the moment of one event.
In contrast to the pagans and the Jewish temple in Jerusalem, in all the New Testament there is no mention that the Christians ever built or bought or owned a material building of any kind that might be called a temple, cathedral or sanctuary for the Lord. So much of Christianity throughout the centuries has been in some way associated with a material building, which is often an elaborately beautiful and costly facility, the highest priority, the biggest item in the church’s budget, and the focal point of virtually all of the church’s activity. The average Christian’s practice of his religious faith is within the church building.
Christians have forgotten that God does not dwell in temples made with hands,
The Meaning of Worship, Ralph Gilmore
Worship is a special combination of gifts from the mind and heart poured out in the presence of God. Thus worship should have motivations: (1) making obeisance (reverence, respect, honor) to someone greater; (2) of feeling awe in His presence; (3) reverently bowing our knees before Him; (4) humbly offering our lives in sacrificial service to Him; and (5) establishing a pattern of life consistent with our worship.
Despite whatever conceptions we may have concerning worship, that is what true worship to God is all about. The modern church is falling shamefully short of obeisance. We are missing that sense of awe in the presence of the Almighty.
“But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship hi must worship him I spirit and in truth.” John 4 23-24.
When Jesus speaks about true worship, He implies that there is such a thing as false worship. Second, true worship is offered to God. Third, it must be offered in Spirit, and fourth, it must be offered in truth.
This idea of true worship and the inference of false worship should be of concern. It is important to be a true worshiper of God. One reason is because Jesus said this is the kind of worshiper the Father seeks to worship him. God does not respect anything and everything, any kind of worship that is offered to Him. That is what Paul meant when he said God was not worshiped with men’s hand’s (Acts 17:25), meaning God is not worshiped with man’s inventiveness and ingenuity as if he is deficient in some way in defining true worship.
Is it Easier to Co-habitate?
A couple decided to marry. He had received a PhD and had a job but she was still working on her PhD. With his career on track and a future wife selected, it might appear that he had made the big decisions. Yet, in the course of their courtship, they had to make a series of tough choices.
First, they had to decide whether to live together. This decision involved weighing the virtues of independence against the virtues of interdependence, and measuring various practical advantages (convenience, financial savings) of living together against possible parental disapproval.
Next they had to decide when (and how) to get married. Should they wait until their respective careers were more settled or not?
Should they have a religious ceremony, and if so, would it be his religion or hers?
Having decided to marry, the couple had to decide if they should merge their finances or keep them separate, and if separate, how they should handle joint expenses.
With marital decisions settled, they next had to face the dilemma of children. Should they have them?
Yes, they easily decided. However, the question of timing led to another series of choices involving ticking biological clocks, the demands of finishing PhDs, and uncertainty about future employment circumstances.
They also had to resolve the question of religion. Were they going to give their kids a religious upbringing, and if so, in whose religion?
Next came a series of career-related choices.
Should they each look for the best possible job and be open to the possibility that they might have to live apart for some time?
If not, whose career should get priority?
In looking for jobs, should they restrict their search to be near his family or her family, or should they ignore geography completely and just look for the best jobs they could find in the same city, wherever it was?
Facing and resolving each of these decisions, all with potentially significant consequences, was difficult. They thought that they had already made the hard decisions when they fell in love and made a mutual commitment.
American Restoration Movement
John Jenkins
865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
http://alumcave.blogspot.com/
"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshippers. They are constantly and for the most part sincerely assured of their greatness."
---Calvin Coolidge, upon leaving the presidency following five and a half years
Observation
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Beautiful Temples
Beautiful temples were commonplace among the Gentiles. Paul said God does not dwell in temples with hands.
Temples were rare among the Jews. We could say they were nonexistent except for the temple in Jerusalem, first built by Solomon.
Paul was saying that no temple ever built by man, including Solomon’s or the Parthenon, can contain God. To think the God who made the world and everything in it and who sustains the world by the power of His Word could be contained in a building regardless of size, beauty or cost diminishes his majesty.
God is Spirit, and spirit cannot be limited to any one space or the moment of one event.
In contrast to the pagans and the Jewish temple in Jerusalem, in all the New Testament there is no mention that the Christians ever built or bought or owned a material building of any kind that might be called a temple, cathedral or sanctuary for the Lord. So much of 20th-century American Christianity is in some way associated with a material building, which is often an elaborately beautiful and costly facility, the highest priority and biggest item in the church’s budget, and the focal point of virtually all of the church’s activity. The average Christian’s practice of his religious faith is within the church building.
Christians have forgotten that God does not dwell in temples made with hands,
Our History
As we look at our history we see the church established on Pentecost was responsible for the many alterations resulting in various denominations.
We fast forward to the Restoration Movement which had the announced goal of using only the bible with the result being The Disciples of Christ, the Conservative Christian Church, and the Churches of Christ. There are different splinter groups within each of these three. Estimates range from 21 to over 50 as to the total number of sub-groups which have emerged from this historical movement for unity among Christians. Estimates are around 19 sub-groups within the a cappella sub-group. Some within a given sub-group will not even acknowledge others within a different sub-group as children of God---much less any who are outside their historical heritage.
In the first century it was all about following Jesus. Today it is all about everything but.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Restoration Movement or What?
As we look at history we see the church established on Pentecost eventually was responsible for the many alterations resulting in various denominations.
We fast forward to the Restoration Movement which had the announced goal of using only the bible with the result being The Disciples of Christ, the Conservative Christian Church, and the Churches of Christ. There are different splinter groups within each of these three. Estimates range from 21 to over 50 as to the total number of sub-groups which have emerged from this historical movement for unity among Christians. Estimates are around 19 sub-groups within the a cappella sub-group. Some within a given sub-group will not even acknowledge others within a different sub-group as children of God---much less any who are outside their historical heritage.
Natural Evil?
There are wasps that lay their eggs inside the body of caterpillars, and when the eggs hatch, the baby wasps eat the internal organs of the caterpillar. They come into the world programmed with an instinct to consume the internal organs of their hosts in the order that ensures their host lives as long as possible. This seems like the stuff of horror movies, not Mother Nature and definitely not a loving creator.
In an attempt to resolve the problem of natural evil, Christians say that no animals were carnivorous before the Adam and Even sinned which is not the most reasonable reading of Genesis, nor can it be squared with science.
That would require that almost every animal on the planet had its way of life drastically transformed. Sharp teeth and poison glands---and the genetic code to produce them---had to pop into existence since animals were going to start killing each other for the first time. Thorns had to suddenly appear on bushes. Vast numbers of vegetarian animals became carnivorous. Scientists believe if this scenario were correct there would be fossil evidence.
Additionally for The Pre-Fall world to be completely free from every kind of physical death, it could not have been an orderly free world at all. Somehow, no animal would have been able to fall off a cliff until Adam and Eve sinned; no branch could break off and fall on a rabbit or empty out a nest of baby birds; no chipmunk could fall into a stream and drown; no hoof could land on a grasshopper. Imagining such a world is impossible.
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Fighting Against God?
Change
On the subject of people believing Christians also needed to be circumcised and our thoughts on how difficult it must have been to abandon that idea I write this:
We can only imagine how difficult it was for the church to change it’s understanding of the Bible in the sixteenth century concerning the earth revolving around the sun when Scripture seemed to teach the earth is immovably fixed in space.
Christians accepted the "new" interpretation and did not hang on to a "literal" understanding of the "pillars of the earth?"
For Christians the nineteenth century was rough. In a span of about twenty years, three independent, technical and powerful forces converged to challenge the historical reliability of Genesis, not to mention other parts of the Old Testament.
One of the three forces was natural sciences advance and its effect on how we understand our planet. In the eighteenth century, geology, showed by the fossil record the earth is millions upon millions of years old---far older than most people had taken for granted and far older than a literal interpretation of the Bible allows. Darwin's work in the nineteenth century followed on the heels of these discoveries. His theory of human origins further challenged the biblical view of the origin of life, to put it mildly.
The second force was developments in biblical studies known as biblical criticism; the academic study of the Bible marked mainly by a historical investigation into the date and authorship of biblical books.
Complementing the work of biblical criticism was a third factor, biblical archaeology; the growing field of archaeology of ancient Israel and the surrounding area.
The nineteenth century was without a doubt a pivotal moment with huge implications for a good many things, including how we read Genesis and thus also for the evolution discussion as well as the discussion of the authorship and dates of the Old Testament including the Pentateuch.
As those Christians in the sixteenth-century changed so will we, eventually, and this will be as difficult to accept as it was for those Jews being told what they had practiced their entire life was no longer relevant and the people they considered less than humans were now their brothers and sisters.