Sunday, March 25, 2012

Gaps Between What We Believe and Reality

For example there appears to be a gap between Jesus' comments concerning God taking care of folks as he takes care of the birds and flowers and reality.

 

But who wouldn't believe or at least want to believe? Hundreds of people leaving hotels, motels and houses totaling millions of dollars, traveling in vehicles that as a group costs hundreds of thousands of dollars wearing clothes that as a group costs thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars entering a building that cost a couple of million dollars sitting on pews costing over $40, 000, leaving to eat meals costing hundreds or even thousands of dollars being told Jesus said not to worry that he will take care of them, who wouldn't believe?. In addition being told Jesus will make some wealthy because he knows they will use the money wisely, again, who wouldn't believe (each praying me, me, me, I can do it)?  

 

Before they left this morning when each of those people took a five-minute shower they used more water than a typical person in a developing country slum uses in a whole day.  On top of that a child dies every 20 seconds due to water related diseases. Then we have those millions of people who experience food insecurity meaning they eat one meal a day or less or are concerned about where they can obtain food. We can't forget those thousands of Christians in Malawi a few years ago who starved to death. Homelessness is non-issue. Jesus did not have a house why would he give us one?

 

Either Jesus was not talking to us today, or the translators got it wrong. Am I the only one who wonders why Jesus takes care of the birds and flowers and lets children die?

Gap 


Thursday, March 22, 2012

Purpose of Marriage?


According to an article by The Associated Press a woman around the age of 25 or so has a 50/50 chance of being divorced and a single mother by the age of 45. Other studies conclude she has a 50/50 chance of being a single mother, with 2 or 3 children by the age of 27 and 31 years. With those odds what is the purpose of marriage?

Wouldn't some guidance from "the" church be appropriate?

Recently I read that while fathers often tell their sons to "be a man" or "be masculine" they have no idea what that means. Their father said it to them so they say it to their sons.   

We are a congregation of 150? in business for 20 years,  we have one adult class, no elders, no deacons, no prospects two adult teachers and a couple of fill-ins and we attend classes where the question is proposed "Why is it important to study scriptures?"  

I wonder if we know if we know the purpose of marriage? I wonder if we know what it means to "be a man." If it is important to study scriptures why don't we?


Marriage? Why?

What is the purpose of marriage? I understand the Bible says that God's design is one man, one woman, until death do them part but what is the purpose of marriage? Could it be to create an environment in which to bring up children; to train children to live within the rules of society; to demonstrate how parents are to act towards each other?

According to an article by The Associated Press a woman around the age of 25 or so has a 50/50 chance of being divorced and a single mother by the age of 45. Other studies say she has a 50/50 chance of being a single mother, with 2 or 3 children by the age of 27 and 31 years. With those odds what is the purpose of marriage?

Two people living together instead of committing to a marriage are two people who do not love or like each other enough to give it a try. They each know that any day the other may leave. It is sad to live with someone who does not love you enough to want to stay.

Living together is an attempt to avoid alimony but then there is palimony.  By the laws of the United States there is such thing as a Common Law Marriage that is equally as entrapping as a marriage with a ceremony.

The question really is "What purpose do you see in marrying?" A second question is "Why is the government involved in that decision?"  

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Blind Spots

We all have blind spots---areas of our lives that need to be uncovered so we can see correctly and make necessary changes. Others can see them in us and point them out but the reality is even then we have a hard time recognizing them.

 

Historically, one blind spot Christians had was slavery. How could Christians who supposedly believed the gospels so easily rationalize owning and enslaving human beings? How could folks who attended church services every week, read their bible and justify treating fellow human beings as property to be used and abused?

 

None of us are immune to such blindness. We all must be on watch and ready to change.

Do We Receive or Reproduce?

In his book Radical, David Platt includes a story about when he was in Sudan. He wrote:

 

"Imagine being in Sudan. You walk into a thatched hut with a small group of Sudanese church leaders, and you sit down to teach them God's Word. As soon as you start, you lose eye contact with all of them. No one is looking at you, and you hardly see their eyes the rest of the time. The reason is they're writing down every word they hear. They come up to you afterward and say, 'Teacher we are going to take everything we have learned from God's Word, translate it into our languages, and teach it in our tribes.' They were not listening to receive but to reproduce.

 

On a typical Sunday in the assembly of the church some people have their Bibles open, while others don't have a Bible with them. A few people are taking notes but for the most part they are passively sitting in the audience.  While some are probably disengaged, others are intently focused on what the preacher is saying, listening to God's Word to hear how it applies to their lives. Few are listening to reproduce."

 

What if instead of asking "What can I get out of this?" the church asked "How can I listen to his Word so that I am equipped to teach others?"

Friday, March 16, 2012

Do We Believe What We Say We Believe?


Recently I watched a video of David Platt (I have a couple of his books) asking the question; Do we believe what we say we believe?



If we believe that everyone is going to be OK in the end — if we embrace universalism, however it is cloaked — then we're free to live our lives however we want, to sit back as easygoing Christians in comfortable churches, because in the end, all of these masses are going to be OK. They're going to be fine.

 


However, if we believe that people around us — billions of people within the United States and around the world who have never even heard the Gospel — if we believe that they are going to an eternal hell without Christ, then we don't have time to play games in the church. We have a mission that demands immediate action.

 


Intellectual universalism (taught by others) is dangerous — thinking that in the end everyone is going to be OK. But functional universalism (practiced by us) is worse — living like in the end everyone is going to be OK. 



Several years ago, I included an article on the minutes of the Men's meeting referencing the story in Numbers chapters 13 & 14 of Moses sending the twelve spies to check out the land of Canaan. I proposed the question "When we look at Pigeon Forge are we the ten or are we Joshua and Caleb?"  I had hoped it would initiate a discussion but I had no expectations. By that time we had shown ourselves to be non-readers. 



Do we believe that in the end the people in Pigeon Forge will be OK? We may not accept intellectual universalism but we practice functional universalism.   

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Berea or Thessaloniki

Ray,



The congregation in Chattanooga Dottie and I visited last Sunday had an auditorium that would accommodate an "audience" of 400 but contained a hundred or so with most our age or older. I expect it will merge with another similar congregation in a few years. An audience is defined as spectators so there should be no audience associated with the church. They had installed speakers the length of the walls but did not need a microphone to be heard. 



Luke told his friend Theophilus the Jews in Berea were nobler than those in Thessaloniki. The definition of "noble" appears to reference willing to examine the Scriptures daily to see if what is being taught is the truth. By that definition are we at GSMCOC more like the Christians in Berea or those in Thessaloniki?

 


Several years ago when Dottie and I went to the Singing School we met with the Highland Avenue C of C in Abilene, TX. I believe they were the congregation that produced the Herald of Truth. If I remember correctly there were a number of C of C congregations that thought the Highland Avenue congregation was too liberal using television like they did.

 


When Dottie and I visited Highland there was an article/announcement in that week's bulletin telling the congregation the elders had decided to take five years and consider the role of women in the church.

 


The last I heard women at Highland Avenue were participating in the assemblies. Now, we can say those elders are nuts or just plain wrong or even mislead but when was the last time GSMCOC considered anything as a congregation? When was the last time GSMCOC could be compared with Christians in Berea? When was the last time GSMCOC believed anything we had not been told to believe by the preacher?

 


We rationalize away women exercising the gift of prophecy in the time of Paul and Luke's telling Theophilus of seven men and four women he considered prophets or even Paul commenting on men and women praying and prophesying. I doubt that 99.9% of the folks know why and possibly 100% never investigating for themselves.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

 


Recently I read the word translated "head" Paul used with reference to men being the head of the woman does not describe a position of authority but more a position of risk, out in front, serving those who follow the head. The word was used as a cowboy would ride "point" or a soldier on point scouting ahead for the bad guys or even as "spearhead" in WWII when soldiers went ahead into new areas. Another word I think of is "pathfinder." Regardless, we need to search the scriptures instead of repeating the old mantra because it is the only one we know.

 


We are adamant about enforcing our concept of what someone else thinks Paul said about women but treat his comments about elders as merely suggestions. Our method of supervising a congregation does not have as much Bible support as women serving and teaching in the assembly. Now that just may be something for which GSMCOC can search the scriptures daily using a Greek or Hebrew dictionary. 



Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN



 

Monday, March 5, 2012

As Mentioned in Earlier eMail

This is relatively long so do not feel pressured to read it in one sitting or even to read it.  If you do , keep in mind these were to Al. And 

 

Some questions I have are:

 

Who tempted Satan?

 

Satan is an angel as Michael and Gabriel are angels. Since we say nothing happens unless God permits it why do we say Satan is more powerful and influential than Gabriel and Michael?

 

James says "… each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death. James does not say we sin because of Satan acting upon us. James appears to say I do not need Satan's help to sin.

 

The answer to my first question appears to be Satan sinned when he was lured and enticed by his own desire.

 

Some classes on why we believe what we believe about Satan might be helpful to the adults.

 

 

This one considers the question are we as committed as what we call denominations?

 

Recently I read a book by David Platt. In his book he mentioned meeting a Christian from the Batak tribe of northern Sumatra in Indonesia. The fellow told the author the story of how his tribe had come to know Christ. Years earlier a missionary couple had come to his village to share the gospel. The tribe was 100 percent Muslim. The tribal leaders captured this missionary couple, then murdered and cannibalized them.

 

Years later another missionary came to their tribe and again began sharing the gospel. The tribal leaders recognized that the story he told was exactly what the former couple had shared. This time they decided to listen. After they listened, they believed.  Within a short time, the entire tribe was converted to Christ. The believer told the author that today there are more than three million Christians among the Batak tribe of northern Sumatra.

 

When the author first heard this story he said he immediately had questions: Would he be willing for him and his wife to be that first missionary couple? Would he be willing to be killed and cannibalized so that those who come after him would see people come to Christ?

 

A friend tells the story of an attempt by five Evangelical Christian missionaries from the United States to bring the gospel to the Huaorani people of the rainforest of Ecuador. The Huaorani, were an isolated tribe known for their violence, against both their own people and outsiders who entered their territory. With the intention of being the first Christians to evangelize the previously uncontacted Huaorani, the missionaries began making regular flights over Huaorani settlements in September 1955, dropping gifts. After several months of exchanging gifts, on January 3, 1956, the missionaries established a camp close to the settlements. Their efforts came to an end on January 8, 1956, when all five—were attacked and  speared by a group of Huaorani warriors. The news of their deaths was broadcast around the world, and Life magazine covered the event with a photo essay.

 

My friend said the missionaries left letters to their families explaining why the missionaries had decided not to defend themselves. They reasoned they were ready to die but the members of the tribe were not.

 

The story is much longer but the question is the same.  Would I be willing to be killed and cannibalized so that those who come after me would see people come to Christ?

 

For many years I was a registered official in various soccer leagues and clubs in Ohio. I officiated youth leagues, senior leagues,  high schools and some colleges. Each had their own way of monitoring officials but one thing they all had in common. Each year they would meet with the soccer officials and review the laws of soccer and any changes that had been made and told us what the laws meant. The laws said one thing but we were told they meant something else and that was how we were to enforce them. We have a tendency to do the same thing with the Bible.

 

On the subject of the morning what would Jesus do if he walked in on a robbery? What would Jesus do if someone struck him? What would Jesus do if his life was threatened? What does Jesus do when his followers die doing his bidding? What does Jesus expect of us? Would we deny Christ to save our families? Do we love our families more than we love Jesus?

 

Sorry for the length but GSMCOC has no forum for discussion.

 

This one is concerning turning the other cheek.

 

Does the bible support a Christian killing to protect them selves, their family or even a stranger who just happens to be in the vicinity?

 

When I consider the number of members of the Church of Christ who I know, who say they are ready to kill someone to defend the physical I wonder what the Amish would do.

 

 

The context was that of McGarvey's preaching for many decades and the majority of the "audience" did not agree with him or believe him. Similar to us to what the preacher says. By the way "audience" is a group of spectators. Preachers really do believe they are speaking to an audience and we are not all "worshipping" together. What we say really does reflect what we think.

 

This is it. NNTR

 

 

 

 


Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN



 

We Believe Because We Want to Believe


Hi Ray,

 


Humans are an interesting species. Truth or facts or evidence are not required we believe because we want to believe. Because of what we believe so strongly others think we are wacky. Ask a Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or even a Methodist.  Christians are known more for what they are against than what they are for.

 


The bible tells us we will find that for which we are searching. And if we do not love truth God will see to it we are condemned (I will provide the support for this statement if you like).

 


Some folks believe Jonah was swallowed by a whale while evidence proves whales cannot swallow an object of any size. Of course we cannot discount that Jonah was a dwarf or the size of Jimimy Cricket or even Tinkerbell. The word translated whale means large fish but that does not detour the whale believers who continue to believe a translator's slant over facts.

 


You and many others I have asked say you pray because the Bible says pray. James says we have to "ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts…must not suppose they will receive anything from the Lord." I cannot pray for sick people or anything physical without doubting because my observation and experience tell me the only way seriously ill people get off the prayer list is for them to die and as Jesus said "His kingdom is not of this world." James also said we pray and do not receive because we ask wrongly. I am now aware anyone considers the reason those folks die is due to us asking wrongly for the wrong purpose etc. When I ask for examples of God healing I am given "there was this old woman a couple of years ago….." 



Most of us cannot apply what we intellectually understand. Read Romans 13:1-6. Paul was talking about Caesar and history shows how Caesar treated Christians apparently under the guidance of God. Let's say God was talking to those who founded the United State now read it again. My guess is you support the Revolutionary war, as do I, and we are both rejecting Paul's instructions to the Romans. Now let's say Paul was talking to the Syrians today:


Romans 13:1-6

 


   Let every soul be subject to BASHAR ALASAD. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists BASHAR ALASAD resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For BASHAR ALASAD is not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of BASHAR ALASAD? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For BASHAR ALASAD is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for BASHAR ALASAD is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience' sake. For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God's ministers attending continually to this very thing. Now substitute Barack Obama. 


We believe what we want to believe. 


So you will not be afraid of a deluge of emails I am going to send you ONE more email with excerpts from emails I have sent to Al asking questions, which he has to date not answered. He believes what he wants to believe as do we all.

 

   

Thanks, John Jenkins

865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN