Thursday, August 28, 2008

The Republican platform calls for a Constitutional amendment banning “gay” marriage.

Throughout the Bible one can easily find that God condemns homosexuality and promises that those who participate in such will not be among those saved. Condemnation of adultery and fornication as well as a host of other sins are also easily found along with similar promise.
 
Christians have selected homosexuality to detest more than other sins. And because of that selection Gay Marriage will eventually become the law of the land.
 
Why do Christians abhor homosexuals but not adulterers or fornicators or other "sinners?" Could it be Christians fear homosexuality and envy those who can "get away" with adultery or fornication?
 
Those who "play the game" and marry but divorce and marry and divorce and marry several times are practicing serial adultery. Christians celebrate such acts by idolizing the participants. Today's Christians are no different than the Christians in Corinth who were proud of their tolerance of the man who had his father's wife.
 
Instead of being selective Christians must "Abstain from every form of evil."
 
As long as our "Christian" country permits adulterers and fornicators to enjoy the same legal benefits as married couples, homosexuals must and will be permitted the same benefits.
 
If Christians want to change the world we must vote AND tell the people the Good News about Jesus. We cannot expect the "world" to think the way we think without the same background, a faith and belief in Jesus being the son of the living God…..
 
 


Regards,
John Jenkins
865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email: jrjenki@yahoo.com 

Hyperbole is the Best Thing Ever.

Barabbas et al

If we break down the name Barabbas like we do Bar Jonah and Bartholomew it means 'son of a father' or 'son of father.'  If names indicate anything Barabbas was a Jew as most likely were the others.
John wrote Barabbas was a robber. Mark says Barabbas was among the rebels in prison, who had committed murder in the insurrection. Insurrection is the rising up against established authority, rebellion, revolt. Luke tells us he was thrown into jail for insurrection and for murder.  Matthew says he was a notorious prisoner. Notorious is defined as well-known, publicly discussed, widely but unfavorably known or talked about. My guess is Barabbas and his fellows had no patience for other Jews who did not join them in their rebellion against Rome. Similar to the way Loyalists were treated during our Revolutionary war.  
A few hours before, Jesus had recalled the prophecy of Isaiah that he would be numbered with the transgressors. To the uninformed they were all criminals deserving of death. Jesus' enemies treated him as a sinner. It may be that the arrangement of putting Jesus in the middle was intended to show that all three were of the same lawless class, that would have been Barabbas' place. It was God's plan for Jesus to be treated as a sinner.  In "being numbered with the transgressors the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all."
I have no idea how long Barabbas and his gang were in prison before Barabbas was exchanged for Jesus but they all may have seen Jesus and maybe even heard him teach. If they misunderstood and thought Jesus was rebelling against Rome they may have even followed him. The one fellow was either guessing or knew enough about Jesus to know he had not done anything worthy of crucifixion.


Regards,
John Jenkins
865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email: jrjenki@yahoo.com 

Hyperbole is the Best Thing Ever.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

The Death of Politeness

Reference your article, The Death of Politeness, Gospel Advocate, August, 2008.
 
Nice article.
 
You mention cell phones and pagers should be turned off during worship services or at the very least to vibrate.
 
Before such technology do you suppose people on their way to their parent's or spouse's, or child's funeral would tell a friend if something comes up please come and get me? Nothing is more important than what you have to say. I doubt it but I speculate.
 
Politeness goes along with respect. Most people do not respect God. Some of us call him daddy, interesting. I would like to be a fly on the wall when they meet daddy face to face. My guess is the term 'daddy' will not come to mind.
 
If we believe that Jesus is with us when 2 or more are gathered in his name and if we believe we are worshipping the creator of everything: the one who made something out of nothing, what could possibly be more important?
 
The congregation is praying and people feel free to enter and interrupt people so they can sit down. The congregation is singing, supposedly to God, but late comers feel free to jostle and bump others until they find their seat. After all daddy doesn't mind.  Lack of politeness shows a lack of respect.
 
Again, nice article.


Regards,
John Jenkins
865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email: jrjenki@yahoo.com 

Hyperbole is the Best Thing Ever.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Examples, Commands, Necessary Inferences

Hi Ray,
 
I hope your visit to the doctor yesterday was profitable for you and not only for him.
 
Sunday, Herb mentioned commands, examples, and necessary inferences. Have you ever wondered if that was the way Jesus thought?
 
The manner in which Israel was to prepare the lamb and eat the Passover is clearly described in Exodus 12 but in Matthew the manner in which Jesus and His Disciples ate the Passover meal reads more like a meal in a restaurant.
 
How about not following an example?
 
In Moses' retelling of the events recorded in Exodus he repeats the punishment for sexual immorality?
 
In Deuteronomy 22:22-29 God told the people the punishment to be meted out on a woman and or a man for sexually immorality.
 
In the New Testament we have the story about Mary being found to be pregnant and we are told because he was a just or righteous man and was unwilling to put her to shame Joseph was going to divorce her quietly instead of following the Law. 
 
In Genesis that God blessed the seventh day and made it Holy and he rested. We don't hear any more about it until Israel had left Egypt and was at Mt Sinai and God provided food on the sixth day so no work would be done on the seventh day. Notice gathering food was among the work not to be performed. When it was included in the Law no work was to be done by neither man nor beast nor visitors (women were probably allowed to cook and fetch water and pickup after their man etc). Jesus said the Sabbath was made for man's benefit and appears to have done what the Israelites were forbidden to do and that was to gather food on the Sabbath.
 
Are we too hung up on examples and not functions?


Regards,
John Jenkins
865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email: jrjenki@yahoo.com 

Hyperbole is the Best Thing Ever.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Laodicea, Lukewarm

The best way to study Revelation is through “first-century glasses.” We must understand what the author had in mind and understand what those to whom he wrote understood the author to say.

Let’s go to the region of Asia Minor; to the Roman Empire of the first and second centuries A.D.; where we find the churches that were the primary and immediate audience for the Revelation.

The Roman Empire was the largest, the most powerful and the richest empire the world had ever known. The Romans were proud that the Roman Eagles (standards representing the Roman armies) never turned backward and that the Empire would be eternal with all roads leading to or from Rome.

Although Rome was a mighty empire, it was a divided empire. Many had attempted to unite it, but none was successful until Rome declared the empire to be divine and its emperor also divine, being Lord and God. All were to worship the emperor and declare the empire over which he ruled, divine. Only the Jews were exempt from emperor worship. The Romans recognized the Jews as a monotheistic people of long standing, who were very important to the welfare of the Roman world.

For Christians, the situation was different. By the time of Revelation, the Romans considered Christians atheists because they refused to worship the Greek and Roman gods and goddesses, and the Roman emperor and empire. The Romans judged them to be a “third race” because their way of life was far different from the Greeks and Romans and other polytheistic people of the Greco-Roman worlds. Paul’s letter to the church in Rome gives us an idea of what Rome was like at this time.

War between the church and the Empire began locally in Rome with the persecution of the Christians by the Emperor Nero after the burning of Rome in A.D. 64. Nero used the Christians as a scapegoat to turn away accusations that he had burned Rome himself. Around A.D. 90, 4 years after he became emperor, Domitian, who was considered by some to be Nero reincarnated, began another persecution and that one was far reaching.

For the first time in the history of the Roman Empire, the emperor of the Roman world demanded that all his subjects worship him as Lord and God and the Roman Empire as divine. Those who refused were burned at the stake, or thrown to the lions. Some, such as John, had the lesser punishment of being exiled. As we know, John was exiled to Patmos which is on the route between Rome and Ephesus. Under Domitian, Ephesus received a new imperial temple. In the province of Asia at the time of Domitian all the prerequisites were present for a major conflict between Christianity and the state cult.

This battle between the church and the empire was to last 300 years.

Jesus had assured His disciples that:

Matthew 16:18
--- I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

but at this time in history it didn’t appear this was going to be the case.
When Domitian was assassinated in A.D. 96, Nerva succeeded to the kingdom by appointment of the senate and recalled all who had been banished. Nerva is considered the first of the Five Good Emperors.
The five good emperors were a series of five emperors of the Roman Empire who ruled in the 2nd century A.D. They were known for their moderation and their reign corresponds to the period known as the Pax Romana. Lasting from AD 96 to 180, these emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius. The period of the Five Good Emperors was particularly notable for the peaceful method of succession. Each emperor chose his successor, thus preventing the political turmoil associated with the succession either before and after this period.
Historical writers, such as Eusebius, said John returned to Ephesus, and regulated all the teaching of the church, holding many conferences, and reminding them of what the Lord had said to them each.
Tertullian of North Africa observed, “The blood of the martyrs has become the seed of the church.”

Rev. 11:15
--- there were loud voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever."

Bob Prichard wrote: The book of Revelation is a book of victory. It teaches that the commander-in-chief of the greatest army ever marshaled on the fields of war will at last place the flag of victory on the everlasting hills of conquest when the church of God will have triumphed, when time will become eternity and earth, heaven.

This is the message of Revelation: the assurance of the triumph of the kingdom of God.



Rev. 3:14-22
[14] "And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: 'The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God's creation.
[15] " 'I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! [16] So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. [17] For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. [18] I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may be rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see. [19] Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline, so be zealous and repent. [20] Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. [21] The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne. [22] He who has an ear let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.' "
Jesus referred to himself as “the faithful and true witness.” This thought is also expressed in the word “Amen.” In Colossians Jesus is referred to as being in the creation with the Father. Having John write that he was the “beginning of the creation of God” would have impressed the Laodiceans that he had the divine authority to command; obedience was necessary, not an option.

Laodicea was founded between 261 and 253 BC by Antiochus II, one of the Seleucid kings who ruled Syria after the death of Alexander the Great and was named for his wife Laodice. It was more accurately known as Laodicea on-the-Lycus to distinguish it from at least six other cities with the same name. The city eventually became part of the kingdom of Pergamum and later it became a Roman possession. With Ephesus 40 miles to the west it was one of three cities in the Lycus River valley-- Colossae was 10 miles to the east and Hierapolis, famous for its thermal baths, was 6 miles to the north. At one time there was a church in Hierapolis under the care of Epaphras. Epaphras worked with the church at Colossae and at Laodicea and some folks believe he established the church in Colossae. He is also mentioned in the Letter to Philemon where Paul calls him his “fellow-prisoner.”
In the 1st century A.D. the city had a large Jewish population which formed the nucleus of the early Christian community. This large Jewish population is thought to have been a key to Laodicea’s prosperity. The regular policy of Seleucid kings had been to offer free citizenship to all Jews, who brought money and trade to every city in which they settled. Josephus mentions that the Jews were so powerful in Laodicea that they successfully appealed to the Roman governor for the right to follow their own customs and laws, including the Sabbath. Paul wrote a letter to the church at Laodicea but it was lost. Imagine a Bible study on the book of Laodiceans!
The church in Laodicea was the last of the Asian churches addressed by John in Revelation, and it has the unenviable distinction of being the only one about which he had nothing good to say. Even dead Sardis had a faithful remnant.
Laodicea was a wealthy city. It was an important banking center and a great manufacturing center. Eye salve was one of the main products made there. It was known for the fine black wool of its sheep. It was one of the great cities of the empire.
At a very early period it became one of the chief seats of Christianity. It is now a deserted place…. It can happen to anyplace.

Paul mentioned Laodicea in his letter to the church in Colossae.

Colossians 2:1
For I want you to know how great a struggle I have for you and for those at Laodicea and for all who have not seen me face to face,

Colossians 4:15-16
Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house. [16] And when this letter has been read among you, have it also read in the church of the Laodiceans; and see that you also read the letter from Laodicea.

The works of Laodicea are not seen in their actions but in their attitudes of which the creator of everything disapproves.

Rev. 3:17
For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing…
They were so well off, they felt they did not need help from man and could do without God.
The one drawback to Laodicea's location was its lack of a local water supply. It had neither the cool well water of nearby Colossae nor the healing hot water springs of Hierapolis across the Lycus valley. Water had to be piped in via an aqueduct. Archeologists have found remnants of the city water tower with the pipes that carried water through the city and many of the pipes are clogged with minerals. By the time the water arrived it was tepid--neither hot nor cold. The city's warm mineral water was great for healing baths but nauseating to drink. Jesus' metaphor comparing the church to the city's lukewarm, stale tasting water would have been easily understood by the Christians of Laodicea. Their apathy and complacency made Jesus sick.
Laodicea was very pleasure-conscious, with a huge stadium and two lavish theaters. The city was noted throughout the Roman province of Asia for its wealth. As the banking center of the province, it was the most prosperous of the seven cities. So wealthy were the citizens of Laodicea that when their city was destroyed by an earthquake in 60 A.D., they refused aid offered by Rome and rebuilt the city at their own expense. Just 80 years earlier Laodicea and 11 other Asian cities were destroyed by an earthquake and Laodicea had accepted Emperor Tiberius’s offer for Rome to help them rebuild. Now they didn’t need or want Rome’s help. This rare example of self-sufficiency made the city famous. Because of their situation the statement, "I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing," is another pointed reference. Like the rich fool, they had it made financially, but they were not rich toward God.
Churches today need to heed this warning. We too are rich --- far richer that we realize --- and this is when we become susceptible to lukewarmness.
Laodicea also derived its wealth from the fertility of the surrounding countryside and its textile industry; as it was famous for its black cloth. This cloth was manufactured from the glossy-black wool produced in the valley, which was said to be very soft, almost like silk. Clothing made from this wool was expensive and highly prized. The Laodiceans wore black garments with pride. But, in his letter Jesus advised the Christians of the city to buy the "white clothes" of purity and righteousness. While well-dressed the Laodiceans stood before Jesus spiritually naked.
Just thirteen miles west of Laodicea, there was a temple of the Phyrgian god Men which had a medical school. Its most famous medicines were an ointment made from spice nard, which strengthened the ears, and Phyrgian powder, obtained by crushing Phrygian stone, which was used for eyes. It was said to cure weak eyes and was exported in tablet form throughout the Mediterranean. The Laodiceans took great pride in their medical skill, and thought they were curing the blindness of others but they were blind to their own spiritual blindness. Jesus appeals to them to buy salve from him so they might have better spiritual vision
Why did Jesus use such strong language in addressing these poor, naked blind, lukewarm disciples? He answers:
Rev. 3:19
Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline…
There is no praise for the Laodiceans, only criticism and condemnation. Jesus identifies this as a time of peace and prosperity, where no outward physical attacks threaten the believers, which has caused the church in Laodicea to be indifferent and complacent. They went from being lazy, to apostasy, to persecution of the faithful remnant of the true Church; Laodicea is the epitome of a church gone astray. Nothing survives today of the once famous Church of Laodicea.
The members of the church in Laodicea were not cold to the work of the Lord; neither were they hot; neither were they up and doing; they were indifferent.
The Christian who has become “cold” knows where he is. Although he is unwilling to repent and return to the Lord, he knows exactly where he is and what he needs to do. The lukewarm Laodiceans did not know where they were. The lukewarm person is in a precarious spiritual condition because he is oblivious to his situation.
A lukewarm church or person is one that compromises with the world and resembles its surrounding society, professes Christianity, yet in reality is spiritually wretched and miserable. We should remember who the church is when we deal with the word lukewarm. Jesus is disturbed when he is dealing with a people He can neither use nor bless. The church in Laodicea didn't oppose him but they didn't draw close to him either. Lukewarm people are not acceptable as followers.
The Laodiceans were like the servant who, when asked to go and work in his vineyard, said, "I go, and went not." They claimed to be Christians, but they were not doing the will of their Heavenly Father. It would be better for the kingdom of God if the lukewarm church or person would deny Christ completely. Jesus warns such churches and people that he will reject them.
There are many lukewarm Christians. They don’t really care what the church does. They aren’t concerned about the decisions of the elders, about the sermons of the preacher, about the songs selected by the song leader. They are an unconcerned congregation. They don’t want to be involved. They like to be uncommitted, unattached. Lukewarm members don’t care if they attend church services or not. They don’t care what the church does. They want to be left alone in a crowd and they don’t want the elders, or the preacher or other members checking on them.
How about these as characteristics of lukewarm people and a lukewarm church?
half committed to Jesus:
half committed to proclaiming Jesus, the Son of God:
half committed to evangelism and missions:
half committed to stressing holy and pure living:
half committed to self denial and sacrificial living:
half committed to the church:
half committed to attending the services of the church:
half committed to supporting the church:
half committed to Bible study:
10. half committed to prayer.
When a congregation is growing and has many baptisms, we say they must be doing the right things. When a church is not growing and there are no baptisms we say the world just isn’t interested. When children grow up to be Christians we say the parents must have done the right things or they were lucky. When children grow up and want nothing to do with the church we say the children just weren’t interested or we blame their friends. The Word of God is either powerful or it is not. Which is it?
Most of us feel that God would never reject us, that in the final analysis God will eventually accept us into what ever kind of heaven exists. But that is not true. He says the Laodiceans would be better off if they made no profession at all.
As bad as their lukewarmness was, there were even more problems in Laodicea:
[17] For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.
They were not only lukewarm but they also thought they didn’t need anything spiritually. They were satisfied. Their attitude was “We have arrived!” There is nothing else for us to do.”
There are many people like that. They have little Bible knowledge, and they are completely satisfied with that little bit. They are satisfied with their prayers, their church attendance, with their church activities. When preachers or Bible School teachers or song leaders, or elders, or, in fact, any of us become satisfied with themselves and their spiritual lives, they are in bad condition.
The Laodiceans had beautiful clothes but were spiritually naked. They had gold in the bank but it was not tested spiritual gold. They had eye salve from the factories but it couldn’t cure their self-satisfied spiritual lives. They needed spiritual eye salve so they might see.
[18] I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may be rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see.
The individual who is satisfied, feeling comfortable and respectable in their religion is the hardest person of all to arouse and set on fire for Jesus.
We are either lukewarm or hot. Are we on fire as a church for God or are we lukewarm? Are we individually on fire for God or are we lukewarm? Apollos was a fervent Christian as we all should be. We should have an unquenchable burning love for God. Paul was zealous and so was Jesus, and Phineas. "Zealous" can be translated "godly jealous," and is a characteristic of the Father. We should be totally committed to God, not half way, not being "half-hearted."
God wants a Christian to be genuine, all the way or not at all.

Instead, Laodiceans straddled the fence.

Christians must learn how to live and articulate their faith in a sometimes-hostile society. Jesus commanded:
Matthew 28:19
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
He intends for us to:
1 Peter 3:15-16
--- in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect ---
John wrote to the church at Laodicea: In Rev. 3:20-21
[20] Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. [21] The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne."
What makes this picture of Jesus unique is that God is seeking man. No other religion has the vision of God seeking man.
We, like the Laodiceans, have been blessed with far more than our share of the good things of life. The danger is that this will blind us to our need for God, and we will become spiritually poverty-stricken as the Laodiceans. Jesus is the Good Shepherd who seeks us. He wants us to be His disciples. He stands at the door knocking, but he will never force His way. We have to open the door.
How do you define lukewarm?

Some Things I’ve Learned Since ‘They’ and ‘Them’ became ‘We’ and ‘Us’ in August 2008 Gospel Advocate.

Jim Faughn:
Central Church of Christ
Paducah KY
Reference your article "Some Things I've Learned Since 'They' and 'Them' became 'We' and 'Us' in August 2008 Gospel Advocate.
My name is John Jenkins. I retired in 1998 from The Mead Corporation (we killed trees and made paper) and my wife and I moved to Gatlinburg, TN from Ohio. We meet with Great Smoky Mountains Church of Christ in Pigeon Forge, TN a congregation of around 120 or so but you would not expect to see more than 80 or so at any one time. With 20,000 visitors each year our weekly attendance borders on 300 with highs in the 500s. The congregation has existed since 1992. At the moment we are early in the process of soliciting the congregation's suggestions as to who they believe should be considered as Elders. Earlier this year we had the obligatory series of lessons from the preacher on Sunday nights about church leadership. Considering who attends on Sunday evenings you can imagine the benefit the congregation appreciated from those lessons.
I read your article and found it to be a fresh approach to the subject. I have a general question: Why is it necessary for elders to meet separate from the men of the congregation (other than on those rare occasions when the subject is private or personal).
Congregations do not know how to work with elders with the result being the elders are a board of directors, a concept I believe to be anti-scriptural. Influential men such as Max Lucado do not help. When Max stepped down (his word) from the pulpit to become just a member, again (his words) he likened it to when the president of a university steps down and becomes a member of the faculty (his words). With that description we know the elders at that congregation are a board of directors with Max, the preacher, CEO.
The church does not prepare men to be elders. We have preacher schools but no elder schools. Right or wrong preachers have support for what they do while elders have none thus they are always on-the-job-training. Major disadvantage and we see the result in who runs congregations.
If we take the following steps, why would it be necessary for elders to meet separate from all the men (other than occasion mentioned earlier)?
  • Preachers will stop running the local congregation and publishing their weekly publication and go off and preach the Gospel to those who are without hope and maybe take some of the congregation with them;
  • Elders will pastor the individuals and do what they must be apt to do and that is to teach; Congregations must be of a size permitting elders to fulfill their responsibilities.
  • Deacons, since they have similar qualifications as the Elders, will assist the Elders in all of their responsibilities under the direct guidance of said Elders;
  • The congregants including the men considered elders or deacons will take care of the physical property, budget, study, attend, follow the leadership and encourage each other to love and good works and perform the work they have been encouraged to perform.
Again, nice article. If you do not have time to respond and maybe even tell me where I am missing the boat, I understand.
Regards
John Jenkins
425 Patterson Lane
Gatlinburg, TN 37738
865-430-4427 home
865-803-8179 cell
jrjenki@yahoo.com


Regards,
John Jenkins

865-803-8179 cell
Gatlinburg, TN
Email:
jrjenki@yahoo.com

Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com/
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Hyperbole is the Best Thing Ever.

Saturday, August 23, 2008

What Has Happened to Bible Class

Guy N. Woods' wrote a book about how to study the New Testament, published in 1992). The issue of bible classes has been a problem, unaddressed successfully, for forty years or more.


Mr. Woods writes:
A typical survey showed that nearly two thirds of members of the churches of Christ have never read the Bible through; well over half of them have no regular plan for daily study; nearly one fourth do not know when the church was established, or where to find the account of its origin; one third of them do not know what books of the of the New Testament contain the biography of Jesus, and more than half were unable to list in proper order the conditions of salvation. A questionnaire submitted to freshman entering one of our Christian Universities revealed that more than half of them did not know who wrote the books of First and Second Timothy, the relationship of the book of Jude to other books of the New Testament, or the author of the book of Acts!
These students, with rare exception, came from Christian homes and were raised as regular attendants in churches of Christ . Is it any wonder that we are witnessing an abandonment of the things once "most believed" among us? Do not these shocking figures reveal a deplorable lack of effective Bible study in the average "Christian" home today? And, do we not have in these developments the explanation why many among us are rejecting the scriptures as the only rule of faith and practice, and are finding more and more compatibility with denominational teaching and teachers.
End of Woods' comments.
A freshman in 1992 would be mid-thirties today, probably becoming a deacon and congregation leader and it might explain what is happening within the Churches of Christ. I imagine the parents of the children in the survey were good people and may even have been "good" Christians but apparently they were missing that there children were not increasing in wisdom and in stature and in favor with God and man. Sometimes they may have suspected but did not know what to do.
Research on the subject has been identifying similar problems in "christian" churches for years but Guy N. Woods is of the Churches of Christ. Instead of finger-crossing and hoping maybe the church should try to know how its children are growing spiritually. Sometimes 18 years of Sunday schools and various Bible Classes are not enough.
Think back on your experiences and the children you have seen grow-up in "church." Of the ones you know about, how many are active Christians today? Now is the time to act to help the church of 2028 (our grandchildren's time).

Friday, August 22, 2008

Jesus forgives our sins once and for all

Jesus forgives our sins once and for all. Out of love and gratitude, we follow him. We pledge to be his disciples, to go wherever he goes. We don't always live up to that pledge. We need help with our obedience.
Obedience is an out-of-date word. We prefer freedom to obedience. We want to be our own masters, make our own decisions. We want to hold our own destiny in our hands. We want to be the boss. And yet, we aren't. We are truly free when we obey the one who made us, who died for us.
Obedience does not come easy but obedience means doing what we should even when we do not want to do it. We go day after day, thinking we are good, obedient Christians. In fact, we are just doing what we want to do. It just so happens that what we want to do is what God wants us to do.
One day that changes. We bump up against a command from God that makes us very uncomfortable. "Go sell all you have and give to the poor." "Deny yourself and take up the cross." Wash one another's feet." "Love your enemies."
The list could go on and on. When we face those uncomfortable verses, we can explain them away, ignore them, or try to justify our failure to follow them. But that is not obedience.
To obey is to do the Will of God, especially when we find it hard. Someone has said,
"Christianity has not been tried and found wanting.
It's been found difficult and left untried."
How do we obey when it's difficult? How do we obey when we don't want to?
We need help. Obedience is learned through pain and suffering; even Jesus had to learn it that way.
Hebrews 5:8-10
Although he was a son, he learned obedience through what he suffered. And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him, being designated by God a high priest after the order of Melchizedek.
Jesus learned obedience. He was made perfect. What does this mean? Wasn't Jesus perfect, the sinless Son of God? We understand how we must learn obedience, but how did Jesus have to learn it?
The word "perfect" is better translated "complete." Jesus was sinless, but he was not the complete Savior until he became one of us, until he experienced temptation. If we believe Jesus was tempted as we are tempted and could have sinned then we have to accept their was the possibility of failure. Part of Jesus, if only for a short amount of time, did not want to do what God commanded. Isn't that what temptation means? Part of Jesus did not want to go to the cross. He wanted the cup to pass. He wanted it so much… Luke wrote
Luke 22:44
And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly; and his sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground.
But he learned to obey, to do what the Father wanted, even if it wasn't what he wanted. Again, Luke wrote……
Luke 22:42-43
…, "Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me, nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done." And there appeared to him an angel from heaven, strengthening him.
More than anything else, Jesus wanted to do the will of the Father.
Isn't that obedience? Isn't that what we need to learn? We need to learn to put our wants behind our desire to do the will of God, to obey.
We need help with obedience, and Jesus gives us that help. His power not only forgives all our sins, it also gives us the will to obey. He is the source of salvation, the source for obedience.
Maybe Christians today are too comfortable. Paul told Timothy "all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 2 Timothy 3:12. I don't know about you but I don't feel persecuted. Does that mean I am not living a godly life in Christ Jesus? Apparently Paul thinks so. What do you think? Maybe I should take a close look at me?
Rather than seek an escape from persecution and its imminent harm, there is a clear message that Christian persecution has value in ways too often overlooked, ignored, or misunderstood. There may even be some spiritual value that is unattainable any other way. Maybe we have too eagerly looked for ways of avoiding persecution and have missed out on some of the greatest blessings God has to offer.
How could Peter and the disciples rejoice in being beaten? How could Stephen ask for mercy on those stoning him? How could Paul take pride in the times of his greatest suffering? Maybe Peter, Paul, Stephen and others are right now asking similar questions about us: "How could they be so pleased with their ability to escape persecution? How can they be indignant with the world's oppressive attitude toward Christians? How can they take themselves to be participants with Christ while pursuing lives of ease?
Paul warned Timothy: "the time was coming when people would not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they would accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions and would turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4.
Each individual is responsible for their own salvation. All others can do is to bring to their attention where the Bible teaches that Jesus is The Way. They must read. They must study. They must develop their faith. One cannot be given faith.
Knowing what to do, (knowledge), why to do it (perspective), and how to do it (skill) are all worthless if we do not have the conviction and motivation to do it!
The population of the United States continues to grow while the numbers of those who believe the Bible is the Word of God and comply with its authority continue to shrink in comparison.
John wrote in Revelation
The Spirit and the Bride say, "Come." And let the one who hears say, "Come." And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires take the water of life without price.
I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
He who testifies to these things says, "Surely I am coming soon." Amen


Thursday, August 21, 2008

How Does One Decide

If an individual does not have a background in the church what they see on television on Sunday mornings would be confusing.

How do they come to the conclusion they should look for a congregation of the church of Christ? If all those people "churches" understand the Bible differently how does the individual decide which is correct?

Not knowing what is the most important part, the individual would have to read the entire Bible and then depending upon the part of the country they find themselves the a cappella churches of Christ do not help because of their multiple divisions over issues that do not determine whether or not someone is in Christ.

It would not be an easy task and without someone to encourage them to keep looking it would be easy to give up. Maybe they are all correct or maybe they are all incorrect how would the individual come to a conclusion.