Monday, February 28, 2011

Questions About Public Prayers

Listen to our public prayers. Now consider the results? James tells us we can ask wrongly: James 4:3 "You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions."  He also tells us we must ask with full confidence and expectation of receiving: James 1:6-7 "… let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord;" And James tells us to meet trials head-on: James 1:2-4 "Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.

 

How many of the requests in our public prayers are simply for our happiness? How many of those requests do you find in the Bible?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boldness

Christians in the first Century prayed for boldness: Acts 4:29-31 …look upon their threats and grant to your servants to continue to speak your word with all boldness, while you stretch out your hand to heal, and signs and wonders are performed through the name of your holy servant Jesus."  Today, Christians pray for safety and freedom. We pray to avoid persecution.

 

Stephen could have remained silent and lived to preach another day. He did not. Luke tells us "…there arose on that day a great persecution against the church in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles. Do you suppose Stephen's preaching caused that?

 

There is no bible support for Christians to ask God for help to avoid persecution: to have things easy. There are bible examples of God helping Christians face persecution and death. Luke tells us: "…he, (Stephen) full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. And he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God."  "as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, 'Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.' And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, 'Lord, do not hold this sin against them.' And when he had said this, he fell asleep."

 

Christians must take the focus of their prayers from themselves to being the Body of Christ on earth and being about the Father's business at whatever the risk.  

 

Paul was focused on God when he told the church in Ephesus: "In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert with all perseverance, making supplication for all the saints, and also for me, that words may be given to me in opening my mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains, that I may declare it boldly, as I ought to speak.

 

When Paul wrote this to the church in Rome: "I hope to see you in passing as I go to Spain, and to be helped on my journey there by you, once I have enjoyed your

company for a while. At present, however, I am going to Jerusalem bringing aid to the saints." Notice he did not ask for them to pray for his safety while he traveled. 

 

We live in a world regulated by natural law. This suggests a certain amount of suffering is inevitable. We benefit from the laws of nature and we suffer the consequences when they are violated. Suppose a car crashes and people are killed---is God to be blamed because a driver was careless or perhaps a weather factor was not properly considered?

Imagine a world where God suspended the laws of nature whenever someone "prays."

Praying to avoid suffering is against God's plan.

 

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Benefits of Suffering

We live in a world regulated by natural law. This would suggest a certain amount of suffering is inevitable. If, for example, the law of gravity behaves consistently, a building may fall on someone, killing or injuring him. Jesus mentioned an incident of the collapse of the tower at Siloam and the deaths of eighteen men, yet noted that those me were no greater sinners than their peers.

We benefit from the laws of nature and we suffer the consequences when they are violated. Suppose a plane crashes and scores of people are killed---is God to be blamed because an engineer, mechanic, navigator, or pilot overlooked or ignored an aeronautical principle or perhaps a weather factor was not properly considered?

Imagine a world where God suspended the laws of nature whenever someone "prays."

Suffering and evil remind us that this world was not designed to be our eternal home. The author of Hebrews tells us we should be as strangers in this world. Jesus has prepared a better place for those who serve him and suffering helps us to long for that place.

Praying for God to help us to avoid suffering is against his plan.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

What are your reasons for believing God will answer prayers for our physical benefits?

 

John wrote that in response to a question from Pilate Jesus said: "My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world." If Jesus did not fight for the safety of his followers why will he fight for your health and safety? Keep in mind one result of Jesus not fighting was children of his followers died. 

 

What sort of world would it be if God directly intervened, suspending His natural laws, each time we encounter a life-threatening situation? This would render the law system of our planet completely undependable and make life a sphere of hopeless confusion. Such a haphazard system, in fact, would argue more for atheism that it would for theism. 

 

Paul wrote in Romans 8:28  

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 

 

Jesus said in Matthew 6:31-34  

    Do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?'  For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

    "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

 

Paul wrote in Philippians 4:6-7  

    … Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.

 

Jesus said in Matthew 26:42

    "My Father, if this cannot pass unless I drink it, your will be done." 

 

Why are we so hesitant to accept what happens…?

 

For some samples of prayers God will answer see:

 

http://alumcave.blogspot.com/2011/02/william-barclay-on-prayer.html

 

 

Monday, February 21, 2011

God Intervention? No.

Have you considered that when we ask God to help somone or comfort someone or touch somone's heart he will do so only through us? If we are the body of Christ what does that mean if we don't do something? I am convinced that God will not intervene except through his people. When his people ask God to comfort someone do we really believe he would not do so except for our request? What kind of a loving God is that?  The body of Christ is the hands and feet and face of Jesus. If we do not do it it will not be done. Based on the common understanding although God wants everyone to be saved but he will send them all to Hell because his people did not ask him to "touch their heart;" he will let an individual suffer because His people did not ask him to comfort does not make sense, at least to me.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

“Religion – Have It Your Way?” December 2010 GA.

 

I enjoyed your article "Religion – Have It Your Way?" December 2010 GA.

 

May I suggest people saying they can be spiritual but not religious have specific congregations or groups in mind and we are one of those groups.   

 

Is it possible that an individual can be spiritual (of or pertaining to the soul or spirit) without being religious (concerning religion (a collection of practices, based on beliefs and teachings that are highly valued or sacred))?

 

On Sunday morning our congregation assembles with most arriving just in time and with the understood goal of not exceeding an hour if at all possible we:

  • Listen to someone making announcements;
  • Sing a partial song (standing);
  • Sing a partial song (sitting);
  • Pray for everything from safe travel to and from the building to when we die "if we are found faithful" entrance into heaven; in most cases the phrase "we pray for…" is used as a substitute for specific requests;
  • Sing a partial song (standing);
  • Listen to a sermon
  • Sing a partial song (standing);
  • Do the Lord's Supper (minimal comments as to permit us to get it done as quickly and efficiently as possible);
  • Sing a partial song (standing);
  • Pray for just about the same things found in the "opening" prayer.
  • And we leave.

Can someone be spiritual without that?

 

Was Jesus religious?

 

He did not follow the traditions to the letter of the Law.

Many of the religious leaders did not like the people He hung out with

He spoke harshly to the Pharisees and other men of learning and status.

He made political matters worse as many of their followers began to follow Him and His teachings.

 

Again nice article. Again, may I suggest we are definitely religious are we spiritual? Will we be counted among the sheep or the goats?


Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com 
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
 
 
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit."
Aristotle

Monday, February 14, 2011

Autonomy

With the many problems the church in Corinth had and the many problems the churches in Asia had neither Paul nor Jesus recommended "discipline."  I suggest we, today, would not have associated with many of those same congregations. Admonishing and pointing out error does not require separation in fact it requires association. We are supposed to be gentle with those "weak in faith."

 

In his letter to the Romans, Paul wrote: "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand." James wrote: "There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. But who are you to judge your neighbor?" In each case the intended audience was people who had been immersed for the remission of their sins. I am saying we need to give the greatest leniency to other congregations as long as they are following Christ.

 

When you remember Jesus' prayer for his followers to be unified I suggest many of those causing the multiple divisions within those practicing a cappella are going to find themselves counted with the  "goats" thinking they were saved but Jesus said he didn't know them.


I do not want to get off the subject it is just the congregational autonomy practiced today is the type of autonomy as long as they do the same things I do in the same way I do them autonomy.

 

 

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Discussion Website

I was taking the day off from emails but when I received the note from the discussion website I figured you might like to take a shot at my response.

I receive emails from a discussion website. A recent email asked:


It has come to my attention that a local congregation here(Bakersfield, Ca) will no longer serve the Lord Supper during the evening worship.

Here's what they contend, they say that Acts.20:7 is reconized as the Lord's Church participating in the Lord's Supper every first day of the week.They conclude that this example LIMITS THE SCRIPTUAL OBSERVATION OF THE LORD'S SUPPER. They go on to say that there is NO DIRECT COMMAND, NO APPROVED EXAMPLE OR NO NECESSARY INFERENCE given anywhere else in the New Testament.To partake any other time than when THE WHOLE CHURCH comes together to partake, is to add to God's Word/Command's. In the evening THE WHOLE CHURCH is not partaking, just a handful of people.So there you have it, do you see it as Violation of the Scriptures or is it Reading the Letter of the Law, but missing the Spirit of the Law.

I submitted the following:We should remember congregational autonomy so if this is what they choose to do so be it. Next: According to Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, in the New Testament in every instance the word "bread" appears it is: 740 artos bread (as raised) or a loaf: -- (shew-) bread, loaf. That means when Jesus was telling the disciples how to pray and he said "Give us this day, our daily bread" and when Luke writes the believers "came together to break bread" the same word translated "bread" was used. Why does anyone think Luke was referring to the Lord's Supper?" On Sunday when we take the smallest piece of bread we can find and drink a partially filled miniature shot glass of grape juice we are not even close to replicating the Lord's Supper we read about in the New Testament.

On the subject of the "whole church" none of us assembles with the "whole church." In our county we have at least 8 congregations and we all meet as individual congregations. Even together we do not makeup the "whole church." So we have to keep this question in perspective.

If a congregation does not meet Sunday evenings they are not "offering" the communion to anyone. If they meet on Sunday evening and decide not to "offer" the communion that is an option open to all congregations and is a congregational decision.

One response talked about the Lord's Supper being commanded. The following is my response to that one.

As a side, no place in the New Testament is anyone commanded to worship. Jesus said his followers would and Paul told us how, presenting our body, as living sacrifices. We have memorial services all the time for friends and family after they have died and no one considers that worship. God realizes worship cannot be commanded. Much like respect it has to be earned and it has to come from the heart.

On the subject of the "whole church" none of us assembles with the "whole church." In our county we have at least 8 congregations and we all meet as individual congregations. Even together we do not makeup the "whole church." So we have to keep this question in perspective. If a congregation does not meet Sunday evenings they are not "offering" the communion to anyone. If they meet on Sunday evening and decide not to "offer" the communion that is an option open to all congregations and is a congregational decision.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

GOP Takes Latest Abortion Fight To The Tax Code

I see the anti-Abortion folks are on the move again.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/02/09/133596340/gop-takes-latest-abortion-fight-to-the-tax-code

 

Have you considered that the manner in which the fetus is conceived determines its right to survive?

"This legislation is really about whether the role of America's government is to continue to fund a practice that takes the lives of over one million little Americans every year," said Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., chairman of the Judiciary subcommittee overseeing the bill to make the Hyde amendment permanent at a hearing today.

But going after the tax code could cause all kinds of confusion, testified George Washington University law professor Sara Rosenbaum. For example, she said, the IRS would have to make technical decisions about what types of abortions can and can't be covered so it can decide what kind of insurance is eligible for tax deductions and credits.

"We're going to need the Internal Revenue Service to define a rape; potentially a forcible rape, incest; potentially incest involving minors; as opposed to incest not involving minors; physical conditions endangering life, and physical conditions that don't endanger life," she said.

If abortion is wrong does it matter how the fetus was conceived? Is the fetus any less human if it was conceived as a result of incest or rape, forcible or not? Do you think pro-lifers know why they are against abortion. It appears pro-life people don't want abortions to be done unless they deem it necessary.  

HPV is a sexually transmitted disease. It is believed to cause cervical cancer. Some Christian Conservatives in our government have resisted a vaccination program on the grounds that HPV is a valuable impediment to premarital sex. They want to preserve cervical cancer as an incentive toward abstinence, even if it means sacrificing the lives of thousands of women each year. 

When we discuss Pro-Life we should understand what life we are pro and if we want the IRS legislating morality.

 

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Reconciling

In his sample prayer Jesus included "give us our daily bread." On the same occasion he appears to be critical of those who express concern about their life, what they will eat, what they will drink and what they will wear. He tells the folks that the Gentiles worry about the same things but your Father KNOWS you need them. Jesus told the folks if they will seek His kingdom first and all those things will be given to him. Now we know: 1) people who do not have food, drink, clothes are not seeking the kingdom or 2) are seeking the kingdom, God knows they need those things and is not providing as Jesus said he would.

 

Paul told the folks at Philipi that he had learned to be content whatever the circumstances whether well fed or hungry whether living in plenty or in want how does that contentment reconcile with asking for "our daily bread" or for that matter asking for anything?

 

How do you reconcile Jesus telling us on one hand to ask for your daily bread and other the other hand you don't need to ask because your father already knows you need them?

 

 

Monday, February 7, 2011

Object of this Life

I read that Alexander Solzhenitsyn spent eight years in prison for making a few disparaging remarks about Joseph Stalin. He went into prison an atheist and came out a Christian. After he was released he said: "I bless you prison---I bless you for being in my life---for there lying on rotting prison straw, I learned the object of life is not prosperity as I had grown up believing, but the maturing of the soul."

If Solzhenitsyn is right and the object of life is the transformation of our character through knowing and glorifying God and is not for comfort, pleasure and prosperity are Christians out of line praying to avoid the transformation?

It seems if Solzhenitsyn is correct Christians would look forward to trials and persecutions.

 

No Confidence in God

Many of my questions began with the Muslims and other religious groups. If we do not have bible support for what we believe we are no different.
 
Listening to public prayers for 40+ years praying for the sick to be healed with no results is cause to question are we doing something wrong or is God just not listening? On top of that listening to people claiming to be followers of Jesus discuss requests for help it comes to me people who have no immediate needs believe God is blessing THEM and are critical of those who find themselves requiring help. People are dying and God is providing parking places for us, God is blessing us.
 
We are sure God is blessing our congregation because we can pay for a $2 million building but just in case we have an emergency fund. We have no confidence in God. We pray expecting no response and excuse everything as God's will. Then it must be God's will for those people needing help. I do not believe that. 

Contradictions Between What We Teach and What We Believe

I agree as far as the crossing of "T's" but we have to be able to support what we claim. On the subject of maybe needing more faith then you do believe it depends on you and not God. OK  I am not saying we shouldn't pray. I am saying if we pray for our own good or we pray with any doubts James says God will NOT be listening.
 
When Jesus told the disciples to pray "give us our daily bread" he was using an example not guarantee. People in the United States with access to food from some source do not relate to people in other countries who during famines have no food source within a hundred miles see Malawi. How do you explain thousands of Christians starving to death in Malawi while Christians in the United States go on diets so they will not eat too much? Only folks who have things pretty much in control believe God provides for them. Those without have no God supplying them.
 
One of the results of our teaching is people claiming to be followers of Jesus not believing. They see no practical reason for Jesus. We teach protection/security/health in THIS life and when folks do not experience it they see us as liars or worse. 

Friday, February 4, 2011

Does God Answer Prayers by Proxy?

Have you considered the church is called the "body of Christ" and that followers of Christ are Jesus' face and hands etc to the world? Have you considered that by the influence God has on his followers he is able to affect the lives of people who come in contact with his followers? Have you considered instead of praying for God to touch the lives of people who are rejecting him the prayer should be for God to go with US as WE touch the lives of those people; as we teach them? Have you considered that instead of praying for God to comfort the sick and dying the prayer should be for God to go with US as WE comfort the sick and dying?
 

 
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com 
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
 
 
Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue.
 

What is God's Purpose To Answer Prayer?

When we pray we should consider specifically what we expect God to do to answer that prayer and then see if there is support for such an expectation in the New Testament. Muslims pray with faith as do other religions so to differentiate ourselves from them we must have Bible support for what we believe-expect-hope for.
 
When you ask God to comfort an individual:

  

  1. Do you believe except for your prayer God would not comfort/heal that individual?
  2. Do you fully expect God WILL not CAN but WILL comfort/heal that individual based solely on your prayer? (See what James says about praying with doubts and asking and not receiving).
  3. What was Jesus' and the Apostles' purpose to heal?
  4. What is God's purpose to respond positively to your prayer?
 
 

When We Ask

When we ask God to "touch someone's heart" or "help them to understand" we are asking God to bypass his way of "the foolishness of preaching" and "faith comes by hearing". Why would he do that? God wants everyone to be saved so the prayer is saying to "we know you want everyone to be saved but your way is not working for this individual so give him something special." If God could do something special for that individual and not do it what kind of a loving God is that? There is no Bible support for such expectation.

What Do We Expect?

In the Psalms when David wrote "Praise God" was he praising God or was he saying the readers should praise God? When you praise your children do you say "Praise 'insert name'" or do you say something positive about or to that child?

 

When we are instructed to pray for someone are we supposed to say "We pray for 'insert name'" or are we supposed to ask God to do something for that person?

 

In response to such prayers what specifically do we expect?

For What Should We Pray?

 

James wrote: "Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights. . ."  do you have even the vaguest idea what he is talking about? 

 

In Ecclesiastes, Solomon wrote: ""that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all his toil—this is God's gift to man" and " Everyone also to whom God has given wealth and possessions and power to enjoy them, and to accept his lot and rejoice in his toil—this is the gift of God." Apparently, since God created everything he put emotion in man to appreciate feeling productive. That humankind feels emotion could be considered a gift of God. He also wrote: "Everyone also to whom God has given wealth and possessions and power to enjoy them, and to accept his lot and rejoice in his toil—this is the gift of God." If you accept that as it is translated God is responsible for the employed as well as the unemployed. If he is responsible for the good he is liable for the bad and therefore deserves praise and blame. I believe the bible disagrees with that.

 

God has set the world into motion and has told his followers how to function within the rules he has established.  

 

The NT is replete with examples of what those first Christians prayed for and they are not what we pray for. 

 

Is God Involved?

My conclusions about prayer are unsettling because believers feel better thinking they are in control; that God is waiting to respond to their beck and call. Their misunderstanding leads to questions like "Why do bad things happen to good people; Why do bad things happen to me? The Bible tells us that without our asking, God will take care of us; that he knows what is best for us; and will help us through what ever mess we find ourselves in.

 

Why are we so hesitant to accept what happens…

 

Romans 8:28  

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 

 

Matthew 6:31-34  

    Do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?'  For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

    "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

 

Philippians 4:6-7  

    … Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.

 

Matthew 26:42  

    Again … he …prayed, "My Father, if this cannot pass unless I drink it, your will be done." 

 

Why are we so hesitant to accept what happens…

 

Thursday, February 3, 2011

WILLIAM BARCLAY ON PRAYER

   The late William Barclay, longtime professor at the University of Glasgow in Scotland whose publications were widely read, and are till being read, in the United States, had a consummate interest in prayer. He published several volumes of The Plain Man's Book of Prayers which included morning and evening prayers, along with Bible readings. He not only authored prayers for festival days throughout the church year, but for such special occasions in the home as the birth of a child, when a child first goes to school, marriage, in time of illness, in time of sorrow, when bad news comes, when good news comes, after a quarrel, when we retire. He has prayers for many professions — the soldier and the school teacher, the doctor and the lawyer, the farmer and the writer.
 
   Petitions from a morning prayer:
   Grant that,
   Nothing may cause us to lose our temper;
   Nothing may take away our joy;
   Nothing may ruffle our peace;
   Nothing may make us bitter towards any man.
  A few lines from that prayer reads: "There is so much for which we need forgiveness. For the time we have wasted; for the opportunities we have neglected; for the strength we have given to the wrong things; for all the mistakes we have made. Forgive us, O God."
   Anyone who has given so much thought to prayer, even composing hundreds of them, has earned the right to be heard when it comes to the "know how" of prayer. In one of his prayer books he provides an introduction titled "Ourselves And Our Prayers" in which he reveals some of the conclusions he has reached after decades of study of the subject. I now share some of these with you, along with some of my own observations..
   Barclay believed that prayer should not be a monologue in which we do all the talking, but also a time for listening for the voce of God. As he puts it: "The highest form of prayer is silence when we wait on God and listen to God." We have a low view of prayer, he insists, if we view prayer as telling God what we want him to do. We should rather listen to God to see what he wants us to do. Prayer is not making use of God, but giving ourselves to God. We are to linger in prayer in silence, enjoying the peace of God's presence, and feel the serenity of perfect security.
   I don't think the professor meant that we are to expect God to speak to us audibly as he did to Christ and the apostles and prophets. We are not to look for modern-day revelations in our prayers. But we can petition God, as did a psalmist, "Search me, O God, and know my heart; try me and know my anxieties, and see if there is any wicked way in me" (Psalm 139:23). Then we are to listen to our heart, to our conscience, for the "voice" of God. Barclay didn't mean that we are to listen and God will tell us what house to buy. God also speaks to us through common sense!
   Prayer is not an acquired art, Barclay tells us, but an instinct. At one time or another we cannot help but pray, and it is noteworthy that in the most primitive of societies people are found to pray to such gods as they have. We all pray, even those who profess no religion, when life becomes more than we can bear. When we face utter helplessness and hopelessness we pray. This being the case, if prayer is natural, why do we need to learn how to do it? Breathing is also natural, as is eating and sleeping, and yet we can learn techniques whereby we do these things better.
   There is technique to everything, Barclay reminds us, including prayer. The disciples asked Jesus to teach them but one thing, how to pray. The Lord responded, giving them what we call the Lord's Prayer. He realized we need to learn how to pray more appropriately. Paul insisted that "We do not know what we should pray for as we ought," (Romans 8:26), noting that the Spirit helps us in our weakness, making intercession for us. We can also learn from those who are gifted in prayer, from those who have lived prayerful lives, through tragedy and triumph alike.
   The fact that God is more ready to hear our prayers than we are to pray, and more willing to give than we are to receive, should make prayer easier for us, and more of a joyous experience than an act of duty. Barclay references two parables about prayer that he believes have been interpreted so as to leave the wrong impression about God hearing prayers. One is the Parable of the Unjust Judge (Luke 18:2-7) which tells how a poor widow finally got justice in a court of law by hounding the judge. Persistence! The other parable is about the Friend at Midnight (Luke 11:5-8) that tells about a man, desperate to borrow food from a neighbor who doesn't want to be disturbed at midnight, but at last relents at the man's continual knocking at the door. Again, persistence!
   These parables have been made to teach that God, like the unjust judge and the reluctant neighbor, may have to be cajoled and badgered — "Bombard God with prayer" we sometimes hear — before he responds to us. Persistence! Barclay says such teaching has done much harm, for God is not like the unjust judge or the reluctant neighbor at all, for he is eager to hear our prayers and more than willing to respond. The parables are teaching contrast, not likeness. If an irascible judge would at last show justice to a nagging widow, how much more will God show mercy to those who call upon him. If a sleepy neighbor is at last aroused to act by persistent knocking, how much more will God respond to those who eagerly petition him. We may be persistent in prayer, and in emergencies we are likely to be, but it isn't necessary, God being the eager-to-show-mercy God that he is.
That is what the parables are teaching, Barclay believes, that God is a loving Father who is rich in mercy, and who does not have to be badgered into bestowing his grace. "Prayer warriors," they call themselves, who gang-up on God and storm the gates of heaven to persuade God to act in behalf of their cause might do well to heed these prayer parables.
   The professor ventures that there are laws to prayer. The first law, he says, is that prayer must be honest, emanating from a sincere heart. He quotes Martin Luther to the effect that the first law of prayer is "Don't lie to God." We may pray as if we want to be changed, when in fact we have no intention of changing. Barclay charges that most of us want to stay the way we are. The peril of prayer, he warns, is pious and meaningless platitudes.
   The second law is that prayer is to be definite and precise, avoiding generalities. We are not simply to ask for forgiveness. Barclay says that is easy and comfortable. We are to name and confess the sin before God. So with thanksgiving. We are to name the blessings for which we are thanking God. Nor are we to  pray generally for God to make us a better person, but to name the ways in which we know we are lacking. It may difficult for a woman to admit she has been mean-spirited and jealous, or for a man to confess his lust or sexual fantasies. Rather than pray for others in a general way, we should call their names, one by one.
   Even if we get all this right, the professor insists, there are still other laws, such as remembering that God cannot grant a selfish request, and that he will not do for us what we can do for ourselves. And that God always knows best. In our ignorance we may pray for what, in the end, would not be for our good. Too, we must realize that prayer moves through the natural laws that govern life. Someone who accidentally falls from a high ladder or window who asks God to keep him from falling prays in vain, as does the one who chooses to smoke all his life, and then asks God not to allow his habit to affect his lungs.
   We teach the wrong lesson about prayer to our youth when we pray that the weather will not disturb their outing. And we can pray until we are blue in the face about our debts — and the trillions of our national debt — but debts will be reduced only as we follow the frugal principles of economics that God himself has put in place. We can pray for the wisdom and the courage to follow such principles.
   Finally, the professor references what he sees as the most fatal error in our prayers, the notion that prayer is an escape from an untoward situation when it is rather a conquest of the situation. We cannot escape the storms of life, nor should we pray to do so, but we can pray for strength and steadfastness to endue the storms. When we or our loved one become terminally ill, it is time to pray for peace of heart and mind, and to praise and thank him that we have a hope that sustains us to the end.
   Barclay believes that there is no such thing as an unanswered prayer. God hears and responds to all our prayers. The answer is not always Yes, for it may be No or Wait. He thinks it significant that in Gethsemane Jesus prayed that he might not have to drink the bitter cup of the Cross, and yet it was "not my will but yours be done." While the answer was No, he received the strength to endure torture, even unto the salvation of the world. Barclay sees that as a great lesson for us on the purpose and meaning of prayer.