On the subject of willfully going into dangerous situations have you noticed how Christians rationalize? Jesus said "he that is immersed will be saved" but some say he meant sprinkling or pouring or even that it is unnecessary; Jesus said to the rich man "sell all you have and give to the poor and follow me" but some say he did not mean all and he certainly did not mean me; Jesus said "Go into all the world etc" but some say he meant send or stay behind and support; Jesus said he that loses his life will gain it but he that saves his life will lose it but some say he did not mean die for him. Christians will say they believe in prayer but do not believe Jesus will help them in dangerous situations. This goes with my Law of Verifiability which says if it is easy to verify confidence is low while if it is difficult to verify confidence is high. It is easy to pray for safe travel but not so easy to pray for protection from men with guns.
In most of the cases recorded in the New Testament I believe Jesus was speaking to those to whom he was speaking at that time, not me, not you. I have no responsibility to go anywhere I do have the responsibility to teach where I am to live for him where I am to die for him where I am, if I want to go fine, but I do not have the responsibility to go.
Stephen could have spoken a little more gently and lived but he did not and he died. I know people who consider themselves Christians but own weapons and say they are prepared to kill to protect their family. Didn't Jesus say something about loving him more than family?
Recently I read a book by David Platt in which he mentioned meeting a Christian from the Batak tribe of northern Sumatra in Indonesia. The fellow told Platt the story of how his tribe had come to know Christ. Years earlier a missionary couple had come to his village to share the gospel. The tribe was 100 percent Muslim. The tribal leaders captured this missionary couple, then murdered and cannibalized them.
Years later another missionary came to their tribe and again began sharing the gospel. The tribal leaders recognized that the story he told was exactly what the former couple had shared. This time they decided to listen. After they listened, they believed. Within a short time, the entire tribe was converted to Christ. The believer told the author that today there are more than three million Christians among the Batak tribe of northern Sumatra.
When Platt first heard this story he said he immediately had questions: Would he be willing for him and his wife to be that first missionary couple? Would he be willing to be killed and cannibalized so that those who come after him would see people come to Christ? Another question I think if is: would he allow himself and his family to be sacrificed by not defending himself against people who are not prepared to meet God in judgment? Would those Christians who say they are prepared to kill to protect their family go into a dangerous situation to preach the gospel? I doubt it.
Christians rationalize too much and we find it difficult to apply what we intellectually understand.