Thursday, February 27, 2014

I am government, trust me

The government program “Aid to Dependent Children” is an example of when government steps in to help it creates another problem. Recently I was reading about Federal programs. Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) was created as part of President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal in 1935 and was intended to supplement existing state relief programs for widows and to provide support to families in which the father was deceased, absent, or unable to work. Families on ADC received support based on the number of children and the father did not live with the family. It appears the Federal government had a hand in destroying the family. 

 

Calls for government to prevent abortions have given rise to laws designed to extend the legal concept of "personhood" to pre-born humans. These laws give legal status as a person to any fertilized human egg, from conception until birth. This includes the zygote before it has implanted, and according to medical science, implantation is the beginning of a pregnancy. These laws permit the rights of the pre-born humans to supersede the rights of the mother. Recently in the news a woman was declared dead but against her and her families' wishes she was kept on life support by the state due to her being pregnant.

 

Christians need to be wary asking government to enforce their moral views.

 

Re: Those Among Us

 

Joe Whitson writes:

 

Noah’s flood destroyed all living flesh upon the Earth. All, in which the breath of life was given, died. Noah and his family were spared to replenish the Earth. Noah’s flood destroyed all but his family.

 

The race of Giants that were born to the daughters of men continued for around 1600 years until the flood and continued after the flood for another 1300 years until Goliath was dispatched by David. These Giants had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot.

 

Since only Noah’s family survived where did the Giants who continued after the flood for 1300 years come from?  For that matter where did the various ethnic groups come from? Your friend might believe Noah’s wife and daughters-in-law were impregnated by aliens. That happened to the women and girls in Village of the Damned one of my favorite movies.

 

Since the 19th century, scholarly consensus has been that the story is not literally true. As I mentioned in an earlier email the 19th century was tough on Christian beliefs.

 

The Genesis flood narrative is one of a number of similar flood myths. Many scholars believe that Noah and the Biblical flood-story derive from the Mesopotamian versions, predominantly because Biblical mythology found in Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Mandeanism shares overlapping consistency with far older written Mesopotamian stories of The Great Flood, and because the early Hebrews were known to have lived in Mesopotamia, particularly during the Babylonian captivity.

 

There are  parallels, both similarities and differences, between Noah's ark and the ship of  Babylonian flood-hero Atrahasis. Noah's is a rectangle, while Atrahasis was instructed to build his in the form of a cube; Atrahasis has seven decks with nine compartments on each level, Noah has three decks, but is not given any instructions on the number of compartments. The word used for "pitch" is not the normal Hebrew word but is closely related to the word used in the Babylonian story.

 

Have you considered that Scripture is meant to convey concepts and is not intended to be taken literally and is not intended to be scientifically or historically accurate?

 

If correct questions long unaswered will be resolved. One is God’s (remember God is love) propensity to destroy his creation and later torture forever those who did not do or say what he liked. Imagine being tortured in Hell for eternity because you played a piano in the assembly or listened to a female speaker or even worse listened to others sing i.e. a chorus.

 

Much of what we teach is carried over from a time when the goal was keep the laity dependent upon the clergy as protectors from God and the only folks who could understand the Bible.

 

 



John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN




Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
         http://alumcave.blogspot.com/


"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshippers. They are constantly and for the most part sincerely assured of their greatness." 


---Calvin Coolidge, upon leaving the presidency following five and a half years



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:59 PM, John Jenkins <jrjenki@gmail.com> wrote:

He makes a lot of assertions most if not all unverifiable. I have observed what I call the Law of Verifiability which says when verifiability is low confidence is high and when verifiability is high confidence is low. As with the Law of Gravity there is no law just observation of consistent behavior. He probably explains Area 51.

 

Who is this guy?

 

 



John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN




Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
         http://alumcave.blogspot.com/


"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshippers. They are constantly and for the most part sincerely assured of their greatness." 


---Calvin Coolidge, upon leaving the presidency following five and a half years



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:45 PM, slate1960@yahoo.com <slate1960@yahoo.com> wrote:


See what this stirs up with you. I responded but can't confirm his contentions, though I do wonder where some of this comes from. Job would probably say that Satin is still trying to confuse us(more).
Ray


Sent from Samsung tablet



-------- Original message --------
From Joseph Whitson <jgwhitson36@gmail.com>
Date: 02/18/2014 3:29 PM (GMT-05:00)
To Ray and Martha Slate <slate1960@yahoo.com>
Subject Those Among Us


   Ray--- for your review and critique.

--
Joseph Whitson


Saturday, February 22, 2014

Do We Have a Clue?

 

 

 

Have you considered that Scripture is meant to convey concepts and is not intended to be taken literally and is not intended to be scientifically or historically accurate?

 

On the subject of heaven it was enough for David to know that: goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life, and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord forever. Did he need more details? Did he need gold streets or pearly gates or was it enough to know: … in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore. David was satisfied with looking forward to relationship with God not possible here.

 

I am told free will will exist in Heaven but what does that mean and what will cause people claiming to be Christian who are prejudiced, argumentative, selfish etc to change or will only the perfect be in Heaven? We are told there will be no temptation. James says temptation comes from within. Having our sins forgiven does not change the desire for sinful things. What will cause us to change?

 

Are we sure we have a clue?

Does Anyone Believe What They Say They Believe?

Do you ever wonder if anyone believes what they say they believe?

 

Christian Scientists believe that disease is a spiritual rather than physical disorder, that there is no death, and that the sick should be treated, not by medicine, but by a form of prayer that seeks to correct the beliefs responsible for the illusion of ill health. And yet they die and no one blinks an eye.

 

Snake handlers believe God commands them to do what they do. Mark’s version of The Great Commission includes: “And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.” Jesus says the signs will accompany those who believe apparently a dead snake handler was not among the believers. And no one blinks an eye. As a side note we “rightly divide” that Jesus meant one sentence for us but not the next and that we can send and not go.

 

I am told God answers prayers and that prayer works (whatever that means) and while he has never healed anyone in response to prayer no one blinks an eye. Al says we pray that it will be God's will for Dez to progress rapidly. Doesn’t that mean it must be God’s will for Dez to not progress rapidly? And no one blinks an eye.

 

When folks decide what they really believe they just might tell others.

 

 



John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN




Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
         http://alumcave.blogspot.com/


"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshippers. They are constantly and for the most part sincerely assured of their greatness." 


---Calvin Coolidge, upon leaving the presidency following five and a half years

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Fwd: Reference Your Comments Concerning Abused Children



What does it say about God observing the innocent of his creation being abused and killed and he does not intervene but on the other hand will answer those public prayers for safety? God cannot protect me from you unless he infringes upon your free will which Christians say is a gift from God.

Is there any similarity between God creating us dependent upon various things for survival and not providing them and me buying a lawnmower, not putting oil and gas in it and then throwing it out because it does not work?




Worship?


In his book "Paul’s Sermon on Mars’ Hill," Mack Lyon writes: “if what I am reading in the religious press and seeing in religious television and witnessing in some places I go is a true representation, the modern church is falling shamefully short of obeisance. We are missing that sense of awe in the presence of the Almighty.”

 

I have no idea what it means to worship. I have never had the impulse to throw myself at some one's feet or even God. I do not experience "awe:" a feeling of reverential respect mixed with fear or wonder.


I don't associate worship with our assembly. Hebrews says we assemble to provoke each other to love and good works and Paul told the church in Rome worship was presenting their bodies as living sacrifices. The bible says Abraham believed God. God spoke directly to Abraham he does not speak directly to me.  Today, how can I believe God? Believe him about what he doesn't say anything to me?
 
For those who believe our assembly is worship we are missing the mark. We are referred to as an “audience.” Audiences are spectators an assembly of worshipers are not spectators.

 

If the assembly is for worship and if there are "five acts of worship" what does singing to each other; praying for ourselves; listening to a speech; remembering what Jesus did for us have to do with worship?. We have memorials all the time and do not consider it worship; and giving for our own benefit?

 

Again in Mack Lyon's book: There are six Greek words, or word families, that translate into our English words "worship," "worshipped," "worshiping." and so on....The most commonly used word defines worship as an act of homage or reverence; to make obeisance, to do reverence to or toward, to kiss. Another word means to revere and emphasizes the emotions of awe and devotion. Another word means to bow the knee before the object of worship. Still another word conveys the idea of sacrificial offerings. One word even implies a pattern for religious service."

Ralph Gilmore, Freed-Hardeman University, Gospel Advocate, August 1995 summarized these for his definition about the motivations of worship: "Worship is a special combination of gifts from the mind and heard poured out in the presence of God. Thus, worship should have these motivations: (1) making obeisance (reverence, respect, honor) to someone greater; (2) of feeling awe in His presence; reverently bowing our knees before him; (4) humbly offering our lives in sacrificial service to Him; and (5) establishing a pattern of life consistent with our worship."

How do those definitions relate to our assembly?

Do you suppose Aaron or Moses interrupted the sacrifices to announce a lunch in a couple of weeks or a special collection for gentile babies?

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Government and Marriage

In the current issue of Christian Chronicle there is an article “Judge Admonished for voicing concern on gay marriages.” As usual, an unidentified source leaked Tabor's concerns to the media and the story went statewide. Gary Tabor ---a superior court judge and Church of Christ elder was formally admonished for voicing his preference not to perform same-sex marriages. He has voluntarily stopped performing all marriages so he can avoid gay ones. 

 

All I want from a Christian in government is honesty, integrity and ethics. I do not care what their religious beliefs are. I do not want a Muslim judge basing his decision on the Koran. Gay marriage is the law in district of Tabor’s jurisdiction and I expect Tabor to follow the law. “Performing” or “officiating” the marriage does not mean he agrees or disagrees. If my taxes are paying his salary he follows the law.

 

The bigger question is why is Government involved?

What interest does government have in "marriage?" And why is it that a person who "performs" or "officiates" the "ceremony" has to be licensed by the state?  Some five hundred or so years ago a "Marriage Ordinance" was created requiring "state registration" and "church consecration." God created the concept of the family and man inserted government involvement. What government permits government can prohibit. Marriage is not a Constitutional issue. 

Why does anyone care who commits their life to another? It is the benefits provided by our government. What we need is for governments to eliminate all perks for the married. Then no one will care one way or the other.

Allowing that moral issues are involved they are best addressed by Jesus and we should let him. Of course that will require that Christians do something other than protest and I doubt if that will happen. 

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Want Truth?

In the January 2010 issue of Smithsonian magazine there is an article about the Dead Sea scrolls. The article says the thousands of tourists who flock to Qumran each year, where the scrolls were discovered, are told the site was once home to a Jewish sect called the Essenes, who devoted their lives to writing and preserving sacred texts. An Israeli archaeologist disagrees, and says the settlement was originally a small fort that was later converted into a pottery factory to serve nearby towns. Which story sounds better to the tourists? Do they want to know the truth or do they want to continue to believe what they want to believe even if it might be false?

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

What Does Being Inspired Include?

We are told the Bible is inspired by God but what constitutes being inspired? What in the New Testament suggests the writers were inspired?  Was John inspired when he wrote Revelation or was he taking dictation? Was Luke inspired or was he making a record for his friend as he claimed he was doing and how about the rest of the New Testament?

 

Were the writers of the Old Testament inspired or taking dictation or reporting? What constitutes being inspired?

 

For Christians the nineteenth century was rough. In a span of about twenty years, three independent, technical and powerful forces converged to challenge the historical reliability of Genesis, not to mention other parts of the Old Testament. The conflicts that ensued are the very stuff of liberal-versus-conservative divide and continue today.

 

One of the three forces is natural sciences advance and its effect on how we understand our planet. In the eighteenth century, geology, showed by the fossil record the earth is millions upon millions of years old---far older than most people had taken for granted and far older than a literal interpretation of the Bible allows. Darwin's work in the nineteenth century followed on the heels of these discoveries. His theory of human origins further challenged the biblical view of the origin of life, to put it mildly.

 

The second force is developments in biblical studies known as biblical criticism; the academic study of the Bible that is marked mainly by a historical investigation into the date and authorship of biblical books.

 

Complementing the work of biblical criticism was a third factor, biblical archaeology; the growing field of archaeology of ancient Israel and the surrounding area.

 

The nineteenth century was without a doubt a pivotal moment in recent intellectual history with huge implications for a good many things, including how we read Genesis and thus also for the evolution discussion as well as the discussion of the authorship and dates of the Old Testament including the Pentateuch.

 

We all have a tendency to believe that the way things are they have always been but this is not necessarily correct and the Bible is no exception. As anyone who wants to remain relevant in their professional field must be aware of changes and discoveries in their field of expertise the same goes for Christians.

If Christians are to remain relevant we should not ignore Augustine of Hippo’s advice?

“In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received. In such cases, we should not rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further progress in the search for truth justly undermines this position, we too fall with it. That would be to battle not for teaching of Holy Scripture but our own, wishing its teaching to conform to ours, whereas we ought to wish ours to conform to that of Sacred Scripture"

One of the reasons the church loses a large number of its youth may be that when those youth find themselves in situations unlike those to which they are accustomed they find some of what they have been taught is not true. That should not be.



John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN




Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
         http://alumcave.blogspot.com/


"It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshippers. They are constantly and for the most part sincerely assured of their greatness." 


---Calvin Coolidge, upon leaving the presidency following five and a half years

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Finances

Considering the discussion in the recent Men’s Meeting concerning adding Brad Harrub to the list of those receiving money from GSMCOC and Gary’s request to consider Raja one can peruse the GSMCOC budget and remain ignorant of the financial obligations of the congregation. If the congregation has the funds to make our obligations we do not need outsider’s assistance. If we do not, the members need to know it. Is GSMCOC self supporting or not?

 

How about a budget that identifies non-discretionary as well as discretionary financial obligations of the congregation? When it comes to items not listed in the budget except for those who are holding funds in reserve for their special projects it is a zero sum game, a dollar given to one is a dollar not given to the other. Why not quarterly distributing to the membership a budget adjusted to reflect the over/under status with budgets adjusted to reflect reality? How about periodically as in annually or bi-annually reviewing every line item and let the entire congregation vote if they want to allocate funds to it? How about a multi-year budget? The ballot should provide for “no opinion” so actual support can be identified.

 

We should require periodic financial reports from all “missionaries” and special requests.  How many people did Brad and Raja and the others ask for help and how many said yes?  Without such reports we have no idea of the necessity of our support. On occasion GSMCOC comes close to what I consider unethical or deceptive practices and I suspect other groups do too.

 

I sent this to you to get it off my chest. I do not believe our leaders will concur they appear to be selective in the information they want to share with the congregation and prefer to keep the visitors ignorant.



John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN




Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Blogs: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/
         http://alumcave.blogspot.com/


“To convince people that they must learn to study is the major obstacle. Most people assume that because they know how to read words they know how to study. This limited grasp of the nature of study explains why so many people gain so little from reading books. 


---Richard J. Foster, Celebration of Discipline

Monday, February 3, 2014

Heaven?

Philip Gulley and James Mulholland co-authored a book “If Grace Is True Why God Will Save Every Person.” Gulley is a Quaker minister and Mulholland has what he calls ecumenical experience in the American Baptist and United Methodist denominations and is currently a Quaker pastor. I bought their book to consider their logic for coming to such a conclusion based on the same bible I read.

 

Their logic is based on what they believe, what they think and what they feel and do not have specific bible support to support the title of their book.

 

We get into that same mode of thinking when the subject is Heaven. The Bible says very little about heaven but we all have our convictions just as Muslims have their convictions. I especially like the fact that if I like to fish I will be able to do that in Heaven. I told the person who told me that that Heaven must be Hell for fish with all those hooks and things. I was assured there were no barbs and it was all catch and release. I hope he was kidding.

 

We can only think in the physical and since Heaven is not physical we have no clue. It was enough for David to know that: goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life, and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord forever (Psalms 23:6). Did he need more details? Did he need gold streets or pearly gates or was it enough to know: … in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore. David was satisfied with looking forward to relationship with God not possible here (Psalm 16:11). Why isn’t it enough for us?

God Does Not Dwell in Temples Made With Hands

Beautiful temples were commonplace among the Gentiles. Paul said God does not dwell in temples with hands.

 

Temples were rare among the Jews. We could say they were nonexistent except for the temple in Jerusalem, first built by Solomon.

 

Paul was saying that no temple ever built by man, including Solomon’s or the Parthenon, can contain God. To think the God who made the world and everything in it and who sustains the world by the power of His Word could be contained in a building regardless of size, beauty or cost diminishes his majesty.

 

God is Spirit, and spirit cannot be limited to any one space or the moment of one event.

 

In contrast to the pagans and the Jewish temple in Jerusalem, in all the New Testament there is no mention that the Christians ever built or bought or owned a material building of any kind that might be called a temple, cathedral or sanctuary for the Lord.  So much of 20th-century American Christianity is in some way associated with a material building, which is often an elaborately beautiful and costly facility, the highest priority and biggest item in the church’s budget, and the focal point of virtually all of the church’s activity. The average Christian’s practice of his religious faith is within the church building.

 

Christians have forgotten that God does not dwell in temples made with hands,

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

It is Written or ??

When Jesus was in the Wilderness his defense against Satan was “It is written…” Specifically which practices of the Church of Christ can be defended with “It is written..?”

 

Monday, January 27, 2014

Go or Send?


The Great Commission

 

Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. And when they saw him they worshiped him, but some doubted. And Jesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age."

 

Those who believe Jesus was speaking to us say He did not mean we had to go but we could send. Usually this is in reference to going to other countries.

 

On the other hand we are told we must "go" and evangelize our neighbors and the Great Commission is used as support.

 

If I am authorized to "send" a missionary why can't I  elect to send the local preacher?

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Need for Leaders

 

 

 

In his book The Age of Turbulence, Alan Greenspan wrote:

 

While each individual has an opinion, there is a visible tendency for much of society to coalesce around a common point of view, which often differs measurably from the choices of other societies. This I sense, results from the need of people to belong to groups defined by religion, culture, and history, which, in turn, is fostered by an innate need of people for leaders: of the family, the tribe, the village , the nation. It is a universal trait that probably reflects the imperative for people to make choices to govern their day-by-day behavior. Most people, much of the time, feel inadequate to the task and seek guidance from religious direction, the recommendations of family members, and the pronouncements of presidents. Almost all human organizations reflect this need for hierarchy. The shared views of any society, in practice, are views embraced by its leadership.

 

He was writing on the subject of The Modes of Capitalism but the need for leadership includes the church.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Survey of self-described Christian adults’ spiritual beliefs.


 

Statement: "Satan is a symbol of evil but is not a living being."

 

40% strongly agreed;

19% agree somewhat;

26% disagreed strongly;

9% disagreed somewhat;

8% were not sure what they believe about the existence of Satan.

 

Statement "A person can be under the influence of spiritual forces, such as demons or evil spirits.

 

39% agreed strongly;

25% agreed somewhat;

30% rejected the influence of supernatural forces;

18% disagreed strongly;

10% disagreed somewhat;

8% were undecided.

 

 

Violence on Television, Violent Computer Games

 

Study is a specific kind of experience in which through careful attention to reality the mind is enabled to move in a certain direction. The mind will take on an order conforming to the order upon which it concentrates. We see a tree or read a book. We see it, we feel it, we understand it, and we draw conclusions from it.  As we do, our thought processes take on an order conforming to the order in the tree or book.  When this is done with concentration, perception, and repetition, ingrained habits of thought are formed.

 

During Old Testament times the Israelites were instructed to write the Laws on gates and doorposts and bind them to their wrists so that "they shall be as frontlets between your eyes" Deuteronomy 11:18.

 

The purpose of this instruction is to direct the mind repeatedly and regularly toward certain modes of thought about God and human relationships. Of course the New Testament replaces laws written on the doorpost with laws written on the heart and leads us to Jesus.

 

The ingrained habits of thought that are formed will conform to the order of the thing being studied. What we study determines the kind of habits that are formed.

 

Study involves repetition which channels the mind in a specific direction, thus ingraining habits of thought. Sheer repetition without even understanding what is being repeated affects the inner mind. Ingrained habits of thought can be formed by repetition alone, thus changing behavior. This is also the central rationale behind psycho cybernetics, which trains the individual to repeat certain affirmations regularly. This principle has been known for centuries but only recently it has received scientific confirmation.

 

This is why the issue of television programming is so important. With innumerable murders being portrayed each evening on prime time television, the repetition alone trains the inner mind in destructive thought patterns. Violent video games would have similar affect. 

Friday, November 29, 2013

Christian and Wealth

 

On the subject of economic issues, the Bible is not silent and it is not a matter of private interpretation. We try to believe that Jesus did not address practical economic questions.

 

The biblical injunctions against the exploitation of the poor and the accumulation of wealth are clear and straightforward. The Bible challenges nearly every economic value of contemporary society. For example, the Old Testament takes exception to the popular notion of an absolute right to private property. Leviticus 25:23 "The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine. For you are strangers and sojourners with me.  The Old Testament legislation of the year of Jubilee stipulated that all land was to revert back to its original owner. In fact, the Bible states that wealth itself belongs to the God, and one purpose of the year of Jubilee was to provide a regular redistribution of wealth. Such a radical view of economics flies in the face of nearly all contemporary belief and practice.  Had Israel faithfully observed the Jubilee it would have eliminated the perennial problem of the rich becoming richer and the poor becoming poorer.

 

The bible deals decisively with the spirit of slavery that an idolatrous attachment to wealth brings. "if riches increase, set not your heart on them." Psalm 62:10. The tenth commandment is against covetousness, the inner lust to have, which leads to stealing and oppression. Solomon wrote, "Whoever trusts in his riches will fall,

but the righteous will flourish like a green leaf." Proverbs 11:28.

 

Jesus spoke against materialism of his day and presumably of our day. The Aramaic term for wealth is "mammon" and Jesus condemns it as a rival God. "No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money." He speaks frequently and unambiguously to economic issues.  He says ""Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God." … "…woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation." Luke 6: 20, 24.

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

1700's Puritan?

There is a widespread modern misconception regarding the term Puritan. Today many people believe good Puritans abstained from all sensual pleasures, and certainly before marriage. Actually, the religious denomination now known as Congregationalist acquired the label "Puritan" for reasons that had nothing to do with moral purity in the modern sense. The movement arose in seventeenth-century England with the purpose of purifying the government-sanctioned Church of England of its Catholic vestiges; hence the name "Puritan."


Unlike today every young woman of the provincial middle class knew that her "character"---her reputation for chastity---was all she had. even a sliver of suspicion that she had compromised herself with a man who had not pledged to marry her might doom her chances of ever finding a partner. 

 

In "Puritan" New England one-third of brides were pregnant on the day they married. Marriage for women meant continuous rounds of pregnancies, nursing, infant deaths/child rearing. Death in childbirth was common enough that many colonial women regarded pregnancy with dread. In their letters, women often referred to childbirth as "the Dreaded apparition," "the greatest of earthly miseries," or "that evil hour I look forward to with dread."

 

In addition to her anxieties about pregnancy, an expectant mother was filled with apprehensions about the death of her newborn child. The death of a child in infancy was far more common than it is today. In the healthiest seventeenth century communities, one infant in ten died before the age of five. In less healthy environments, three children in ten died before their fifth birthday. Puritan minister Cotton Mather saw eight of his fifteen children die before reaching the age of two.

 

Today, most women give birth in hospitals under close medical supervision, if they wish, women can take anesthetics. During the seventeen century in colonial America, the typical woman gave birth to her children at home, while female kin and neighbors at her bedside to offer support and encouragement. When the daughter of Samuel Sewall, a Puritan magistrate, gave birth to her first child on the last day of January, 1701, at least eight other women were present at her bedside, including her mother, her mother-in-law, a midwife, a nurse, and at least four other neighbors.

 

During labor, midwives administered no painkillers, except for alcohol. Pain in childbirth was considered God's punishment for Eve's sin of eating the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Women were merely advised to "arm themselves with patience" and prayer and to try, during labor, to restrain "those dreadful groans and cries which do so much discourage their friends and relations that are near them."

 

After delivery, new mothers were often treated to a banquet. At one such event, visitors feasted on "boiled pork, beef, fowls, very good roast beef, turkey-pie, [and] tarts." Women from well-to-do families were then expected to spend three to four weeks in bed convalescing. Their attendants kept the fire place burning and wrapped them in a heavy blanket in order to help them sweat out "poisons." Women from poorer families were generally back at work in one or two days.

 

In her book When Abortion Was a Crime, Leslie J. Reagan writes that abortion has been a common procedure -- "part of life" -- in America since the eighteenth century, both during the slightly more than half of our history as a nation when it has been legal and during the slightly less than half when it was not.

 

Christians are typically anti-abortion with some exceptions. Exceptions void the argument the fetus is human life therefore abortion is murder. The condition of the fetus or the manner of conception such as rape or incest do not define the fetus. Human life is human life.

 

Moral Purity

The scribes and Pharisees brought to Jesus a woman who had been caught in adultery. Throwing her at his feet, they said to Jesus. "Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. In the law Moses commanded us to stone such a woman. What do you say?"
 
Jesus said to them, "The law is clear. we'll have to kill her."
 
And saying that, he picked up a rock and threw it at her, striking her on the head.
 
The scribes and Pharisees joined in with great enthusiasm, throwing stones at the woman until she was dead.
 
Then Jesus turned to them and said, "Let she who is with sin be stoned."
 
And the scribes and Pharisees marveled at his devotion to purity.
 
This is did not happen. Jesus pointed out the sinfulness of all people and forgave the woman. It was acts such as this that led to his arrest and murder. Grace is a scandal when we're infatuated with moral purity.